Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35870137›Full record

ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2022

Outcome and long-term treatment protocol for topical tacrolimus in oral lichen planus.

S Utz, V G A Suter, S Cazzaniga, L Borradori, L Feldmeyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. What can we learn from treatments of oral lichen planus?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

S UtzDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-6995
V G A SuterDepartment of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3206-5266
S CazzanigaDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
L BorradoriDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0424-6297
L FeldmeyerDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveTopical tacrolimus has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP). However, long-term effects and its optimal application protocol with gradual reduction have not been studied. Accordingly, we analysed the clinical response of OLP to tacrolimus in our daily clinical practice with a focus on the optimal long-term therapeutic scheme.

methodsRetrospective analysis of all consecutive patients diagnosed with OLP and treated with topical tacrolimus (0.03% oral rinse) in a clinical setting between 2015 and 2020. The objective clinical response was measured by a 4-point scale (complete remission, major remission, partial remission and no response), and subjective impairment by a 3-point scale (severe, moderate and none).

resultsFifty-seven patients (74% women; median age: 66 years) were included. Fifty-six (98%) patients had prior treatment with topical steroids. After introduction of tacrolimus, objective remission (major or complete) was reached by 28%, 62%, 87% and 97% of patients after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. Subjective remission was reported by 16%, 48%, 69% and 83% after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment respectively. The treatment frequency could be gradually reduced from initially twice daily to once daily or less in 28%, 61%, 78% and 87% after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months respectively; 41% of patients completely suspended the treatment at one point, but 67% of them experienced a relapse after a median time of 3.3 months. Four patients (7%) developed a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) during the observation period. Otherwise, there were only few and minor side-effects.

conclusionTopical tacrolimus can be an effective second-line therapy for OLP refractory to potent topical corticosteroids. The therapy frequency can often be reduced during the maintenance period. Both signs of clinical activity and subjective impairment should guide therapy. Regular follow-up is necessary to recognize possible SCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellLichen Planus, OralAdministration, TopicalAgedClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesTacrolimusTreatment OutcomeImmunosuppressive AgentsTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID35870137
PMCPMC9804806
OpenAlexW4286771150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.