ReviewAdvances in therapy2022
Preparation and Utility of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) for Facial Aging: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Platelet rich plasma for facial rejuvenation: an overview of systematic reviews.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2024Pooled it
- Dual-modality approach with 675 nm laser and microfocused ultrasound for facial aging: retrospective evaluation.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of leukocyte-poor and leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma in rabbit knee osteoarthritis and the study of autophagy mechanism.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- The therapeutic effect of sufficient oxygen-rich PRP injection in facial rejuvenation by multiple objective evaluations in 26 cases.Regenerative therapy · 2024Article
- Molybdesum selenide-based platelet-rich plasma containing carboxymethyl chitosan/polyvinyl pyrrolidone composite antioxidant hydrogels dressing promotes the wound healing.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Approaches in line with human physiology to prevent skin aging.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- The Potential Therapeutic Effects of Platelet-Derived Biomaterials on Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.International journal of biomaterials · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained tremendous traction for a broad variety of indications within regenerative medicine. Despite a lack of standardized literature assessing efficacy and best practice procedures for preparation, PRP has become increasingly utilized for cutaneous rejuvenation. In this review, we highlight the many variations that may affect the quality and effectiveness of PRP, while also outlining the highest quality evidence that exists for facial rejuvenation. In reviewing the use of PRP for this indication, most high-quality evidence suggests subtle to modest clinical improvement, with many studies demonstrating conflicting results. Additional high-quality investigative work with clearly delineated methodologies is needed in order to better understand the role of PRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35870104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.