Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35869798›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2022

Long-term outcomes of resection versus transplantation for neuroendocrine liver metastases meeting the Milan criteria.

Marianna Maspero, Roberta Elisa Rossi, Carlo Sposito, Jorgelina Coppa, Davide Citterio, Vincenzo Mazzaferro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cancers · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Long-term outcomes of resection versus transplantation for neuroendocrine liver metastases meeting the Milan criteria.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marianna MasperoGeneral Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7589-4489
Roberta Elisa RossiGeneral Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Carlo SpositoGeneral Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Jorgelina CoppaGeneral Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Davide CitterioGeneral Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo MazzaferroGeneral Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver resection (LR) is considered the treatment of choice for resectable neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), while liver transplantation (LT) is currently reserved for highly selected unresectable patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive patients undergoing either curative resection or transplantation for liver-only NELM meeting Milan criteria at a single center between 1984 and 2019. Patients who fit Milan criteria were 48 in the transplantation group and 56 in the resection group. After a median follow-up of 158 months for the transplantation group and 126 for the resection group, the 10-year survival rate was 93% for transplantation and 75% for resection (p = .007). The 10-year disease-free survival rate was 52% for transplantation and 18% for resection (p < .001). Transplantation was associated with improved survival at univariate analysis. The median disease-free interval between surgery and recurrence was 78 months for transplantation vs. 24 months for resection (p < .001). The transplantation group had more multisite recurrences (12/25, 48% vs. 5/42, 12% in the resection group, p = .001), while most recurrences in the resection group were intra-hepatic (37/42, 88%, versus 2/25, 8% in the transplantation group). In conclusion, LT was associated with improved survival outcomes in NELM meeting the Milan criteria compared with LR.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationHepatectomyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective Studiescancer/malignancy/neoplasia: metastatic diseaseclassification systems: Milan criteria, clinical decision-makingclinical research/practicehematology/oncologyliver disease: malignant, patient survivalliver transplantation/hepatology

Identifiers

PMID35869798
OpenAlexW4286697089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.