Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35869689›Full record

SynthesisPharmacotherapy2022

Vancomycin area under the curve versus trough only guided dosing and the risk of acute kidney injury: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Emily Abdelmessih, Nandini Patel, Janaki Vekaria, Brynna Crovetto, Savanna SanFilippo, Christopher Adams, Luigi Brunetti

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pharmacotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Safe and effective use of vancomycin.Australian prescriber · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily AbdelmessihErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1710-5952
Nandini PatelErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Janaki VekariaErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Brynna CrovettoTouro College of Pharmacy, New York, New York, USA.
Savanna SanFilippoTabula Rasa Healthcare, Moorestown, New Jersey, USA.
Christopher AdamsDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Luigi BrunettiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0565-6167
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USTouro College · US

Funding

Racial differences in MT1/MT2 receptor expression in human kidneysR01DK131214 · NIDDK · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI Luigi Brunetti · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK131214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancomycin is commonly used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections and is known to cause nephrotoxicity. Previous Vancomycin Consensus Guidelines recommended targeting trough concentrations but the 2020 Guidelines suggest monitoring vancomycin area under the curve (AUC) given the reduced risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) at similar levels of efficacy. This meta-analysis compares vancomycin-induced AKI incidence using AUC-guided dosing strategies versus trough-based monitoring. Literature was queried from Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, and Google Scholar from database inception through November 5, 2021. Interventional or observational studies reporting the incidence of vancomycin-induced AKI between AUC- and trough-guided dosing strategies were included. In the primary analysis, the Vancomycin Consensus Guidelines definition for AKI was used if reported; otherwise, the Risk, Injury, and Failure; and Loss, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) or Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definitions were used. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was evaluated between the two strategies using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses for adjusted ORs and AKI definitions were performed. Heterogeneity was identified using Cochrane's Q test and I

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveElectrolytesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsElectrolytesVancomycinacute kidney injuryarea under the curvenephrotoxicitytroughvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID35869689
PMCPMC9481691
OpenAlexW4286790185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.