Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022
Time of Resumption of Antiplatelet Drugs After Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.
Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delphi consensus statement for the management of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients after antiplatelet therapy induced gastrointestinal bleeding: timing.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the optimum time to reintroduce the original antiplatelet drugs after upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients as secondary prevention for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS After the upper gastrointestinal bleeding stopped, patients were randomly divided according to the oral antiplatelet drugs administered. The aspirin group was further divided into 3-day and 7-day aspirin groups. The patients who took aspirin and clopidogrel were randomly divided into 3 groups: 0-day aspirin+3-day clopidogrel; 0-day aspirin+7-day clopidogrel; and 3-day aspirin+7-day clopidogrel. The recovery time, rebleeding rate, incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and death were observed. RESULTS The 3-day aspirin group had more rebleeding, reduced risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and a similar mortality rate compared to the other groups. In the aspirin+clopidogrel group, the 0-day aspirin+3-day clopidogrel group had the highest rebleeding rate and the lowest risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The 3-day aspirin+7-day clopidogrel group had the highest risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and increased hospitalization time. The risk of rebleeding and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was lower in the 0-day aspirin+7-day clopidogrel group, and the overall mortality rate was the lowest in this group. CONCLUSIONS In patients receiving only aspirin, this drug should be reintroduced as soon as possible after peptic ulcer hemorrhage. Aspirin and clopidogrel are dual antiplatelet drugs used for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. In patients under dual-drug therapy, aspirin should not be stopped, while clopidogrel should be restarted in about 7 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.