ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2022
Contrasting Frontoparietal Network Connectivity in Antipsychotic Medication-Naive First-Episode Psychosis Patients Who Do and Do Not Display Features of the Deficit Syndrome.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous Brain Activity Alterations in First-Episode Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2023Pooled it
- Cognitive subtypes and brain network differences in antipsychotic-naïve first-episode psychosis.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Memory and learning impairments in deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia: a scoping review.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2026Review
- A Systematic Review of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Literature Investigating the Deficit Syndrome in Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe deficit syndrome is a clinical subtype of schizophrenia that is characterized by enduring negative symptoms. Several lines of evidence point to frontoparietal involvement, but the frontoparietal control network (FPCN) and its subsystems (FPCNA and FPCNB) proposed by Yeo et al. have not been systematically characterized at rest in patients with the deficit syndrome.
methodsWe used resting-state fMRI to investigate the FPCN and its subnetworks in 72 healthy controls and 65 antipsychotic medication-naive, first-episode psychosis patients (22 displayed deficit syndrome features, 43 did not). To assess whole-brain FPCN connectivity, we used the right posterior parietal cortex as the seed region. We then performed region of interest analyses in FPCN subsystems.
resultsWe found that patterns of FPCN dysconnectivity to the whole brain differed in patients who displayed deficit syndrome features compared with those who did not. Examining the FPCN on a more granular level revealed reduced within-FPCN(A) connectivity only in patients displaying deficit features. FPCNB connectivity did not differ between patient groups. DISCUSSION: Here, we describe a neurobiological signature of aberrant FPCN connectivity in antipsychotic-naive, first-episode patients who display clinical features of the deficit syndrome. Importantly, frontoparietal subnetwork connectivity differentiated subgroups, where the FPCNA is selectively involved in patients with deficit features. Our findings add to the growing body of literature supporting a neurobiological distinction between two clinical subtypes of schizophrenia, which has the potential to be leveraged for patient stratification in clinical trials and the development of novel treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.