Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35869533›Full record

Trial reportTrials2022

REACH-ASD: a UK randomised controlled trial of a new post-diagnostic psycho-education and acceptance and commitment therapy programme against treatment-as-usual for improving the mental health and adjustment of caregivers of children recently diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.

Kathy Leadbitter, Richard Smallman, Kirsty James, Gemma Shields, Ceri Ellis, Sophie Langhorne, Louisa Harrison, Latha Hackett, Alison Dunkerley, Leo Kroll and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What Are the Important Health and Well-Being Outcome Dimensions for Parent Carers of Disabled Children? A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Benchmarking Site Activation and Patient Enrollment.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kathy LeadbitterDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Kathy.Leadbitter@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-2800
Richard SmallmanDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kirsty JamesDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
Gemma ShieldsDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ceri EllisDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sophie LanghorneDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Louisa HarrisonDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Latha HackettManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Alison DunkerleyManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Leo KrollPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Linda DaviesDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Richard EmsleyDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
Penny BeeDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jonathan GreenDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
REACH-ASD Team
University of Manchester · GBKing's College London · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme 17/80/09Medical Research Council MR/K005863/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutism is a neurodevelopmental disability affecting over 1% of UK children. The period following a child's autism diagnosis can present real challenges in adaptation for families. Twenty to 50% of caregivers show clinically significant levels of mental health need within the post-diagnostic period and on an ongoing basis. Best practice guidelines recommend timely post-diagnostic family support. Current provision is patchy, largely unevidenced, and a source of dissatisfaction for both families and professionals. There is a pressing need for an evidenced programme of post-diagnostic support focusing on caregiver mental health and adjustment, alongside autism psycho-education. This trial tests the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new brief manualised psychosocial intervention designed to address this gap.

methodsThis is a multi-centre two-parallel-group single (researcher)-blinded randomised controlled trial of the Empower-Autism programme plus treatment-as-usual versus usual local post-diagnostic offer plus treatment-as-usual. Caregivers of children aged 2-15 years with a recent autism diagnosis will be recruited from North West England NHS or local authority centres. Randomisation is individually by child, with one "index" caregiver per child, stratified by centre, using 2:1 randomisation ratio to assist recruitment and timely intervention. Empower-Autism is a group-based, manualised, post-diagnostic programme that combines autism psycho-education and psychotherapeutic components based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to support caregiver mental health, stress management and adjustment to their child's diagnosis. The comparator is any usual local group-based post-diagnostic psycho-education offer. Receipt of services will be specified through health economic data. PRIMARY OUTCOME: caregiver mental health (General Health Questionnaire-30) at 52-week follow-up. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: key caregiver measures (wellbeing, self-efficacy, adjustment, autism knowledge) at 12-, 26- and 52-week follow-up and family and child outcomes (wellbeing and functioning) at 52-week endpoint. SAMPLE: N=380 (approximately 253 intervention/127 treatment-as-usual). Primary analysis will follow intention-to-treat principles using linear mixed models with random intercepts for group membership and repeated measures. Cost-effectiveness acceptability analyses will be over 52 weeks, with decision modelling to extrapolate to longer time periods. DISCUSSION: If effective, this new approach will fill a key gap in the provision of evidence-based care pathways for autistic children and their families.

trial registrationISRCTN 45412843 . Prospectively registered on 11 September 2019.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyAutism Spectrum DisorderCaregiversChildCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMental HealthQuality of LifeUnited KingdomAcceptance and commitment therapyAutismCaregiversDiagnosisPsycho-educationRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID35869533
PMCPMC9306249
OpenAlexW4286717541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.