ReviewImplementation science communications2022
The effectiveness of champions in implementing innovations in health care: a systematic review.
Review in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
117 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- When Tech Meets Touch: Multistakeholder Perspectives and Implementation Strategies for eHealth in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review Using Computational Linguistics.Journal of nursing management · 2026Pooled it
- Training and education provided to local change champions within implementation trials: a rapid systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of implementation strategies on nursing practice and patient outcomes: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Implementation science : IS · 2024Pooled it
- The role of champions in the implementation of technology in healthcare services: a systematic mixed studies review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Implementation of interprofessional quality circles on deprescribing in Swiss nursing homes: an observational study.BMC geriatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of health literacy champions: who, what and how?Health promotion international · 2023Pooled it
- Champion-Led Deprescribing for Persons with Dementia in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study in Accountable Care Organizations.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Trial
- Barriers and facilitators to using practice facilitators to implement a remote cancer symptom management intervention: a mixed methods study.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Implementation facilitators and barriers of stress first aid to protect mental health of frontline health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Pilot implementation study of a web-based men's health screening app in primary care during COVID-19: a mixed-methods approach.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Factors influencing fidelity to guideline implementation strategies for improving pain care at cancer centres: a qualitative sub-study of the Stop Cancer PAIN Trial.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Practice Facilitation to Address Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA health forum · 2024Trial
- Bereavement care practices: A national survey of Australian paediatric intensive care units.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Three Case-Based Approaches to Preimplementation Evaluation in Nursing Homes: Understanding Enablers, Barriers, and Implementation Strategies.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2026Article
- Profiles of Innovative Behaviour Among Community Nurses and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators in Using Personal Hearing Amplifiers from the Perspective of Healthcare Providers.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2026Article
- Implementing discharge summary documentation: a quality improvement initiative in a Nigerian hospital.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Determinants and Strategies for Implementation of an Adapted Data to Care Vertical HIV Prevention Intervention in a South African Context.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Implementing Point-of-Care Fingerstick Testing for Clozapine Safety Monitoring in Outpatient Psychiatry: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Enhancing organizational resilience of emergency medical services through a designated intervention program.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChampions have been documented in the literature as an important strategy for implementation, yet their effectiveness has not been well synthesized in the health care literature. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether champions, tested in isolation from other implementation strategies, are effective at improving innovation use or outcomes in health care.
methodsThe JBI systematic review method guided this study. A peer-reviewed search strategy was applied to eight electronic databases to identify relevant articles. We included all published articles and unpublished theses and dissertations that used a quantitative study design to evaluate the effectiveness of champions in implementing innovations within health care settings. Two researchers independently completed study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal. We used content analysis and vote counting to synthesize our data.
resultsAfter screening 7566 records titles and abstracts and 2090 full text articles, we included 35 studies in our review. Most of the studies (71.4%) operationalized the champion strategy by the presence or absence of a champion. In a subset of seven studies, five studies found associations between exposure to champions and increased use of best practices, programs, or technological innovations at an organizational level. In other subsets, the evidence pertaining to use of champions and innovation use by patients or providers, or at improving outcomes was either mixed or scarce.
conclusionsWe identified a small body of literature reporting an association between use of champions and increased instrumental use of innovations by organizations. However, more research is needed to determine causal relationship between champions and innovation use and outcomes. Even though there are no reported adverse effects in using champions, opportunity costs may be associated with their use. Until more evidence becomes available about the effectiveness of champions at increasing innovation use and outcomes, the decision to deploy champions should consider the needs and resources of the organization and include an evaluation plan. To further our understanding of champions' effectiveness, future studies should (1) use experimental study designs in conjunction with process evaluations, (2) describe champions and their activities and (3) rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of champions' activities. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/ba3d2 ). Registered on November 15, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.