Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35869445›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2022

Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol.

Maayan Zucker, Gregory Kagan, Nimrod Adi, Ilai Ronel, Idit Matot, Lilach Zac, Or Goren

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07028593 (Effects of Ciprofol on Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07028593 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Ciprofol on Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery (CP-MINS) in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Propofol-Controlled, Multicenter Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTongji HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,058ConditionsMyocardial Injury, Thoracic Diseases, Thoracoscopic SurgeryArmsPropofol, ciprofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Perioperative management of the vulnerable and failing right ventricle.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maayan ZuckerSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. zuckermaayan@gmail.com.
Gregory KaganDivision of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nimrod AdiDivision of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ilai RonelDivision of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Idit MatotDivision of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Lilach ZacDivision of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Or GorenDivision of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven a small change in the pressure gradient between the venous system and the right atrium can have significant hemodynamic effects. Mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) is the driving force of the venous system. As a result, MSFP has a significant effect on cardiac output. We aimed to test the hypothesis that the hemodynamic instability during induction of general anesthesia by intravenous propofol administration is caused by changes in MSFP.

methodsWe prospectively collected data from 15 patients undergoing major surgery requiring invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Hemodynamic parameters, including MSFP, were measured before and after propofol administration and following intubation, using venous return curves at a no-flow state induced by a pneumatic tourniquet.

resultsA significant decrease in MSFP was observed in all study patients after propofol administration (median (IQR) pressure 17 (9) mmHg compared with 25 (7) before propofol administration, p = 0.001). The pressure gradient for venous return (MSFP - central venous pressure; CVP) also decreased following propofol administration from 19 (8) to 12 (6) mmHg, p = 0.001. Central venous pressure did not change.

conclusionsThese results support the hypothesis that induction of anesthesia with propofol causes a marked reduction in MSFP. A possible mechanism of propofol-induced hypotension is reduction in preload due to a decrease in the venous vasomotor tone.

Indexed as

Hemodynamic MonitoringPropofolAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousBlood PressureCardiac OutputHemodynamicsHumansAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolCardiac outputGeneral anesthesiaMean systemic filling pressurePropofolVenous resistance

Identifiers

PMID35869445
PMCPMC9306094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.