ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2022
Do Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors have a Role in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves?
Review in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical heart valves (MHVs) replacement is recommended for younger patients with valvular heart disease because of the durability of the mechanical valve, but these patients need antithrombotic therapy for a lifelong time. The vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin is the only approved oral antithrombotic drug for patients with MHVs. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, present some advantages over warfarin, such as weak interaction with drugs, no need for routine monitoring of coagulation function, and no frequent adjustment of medication dose. DOACs have been approved in the antithrombotic treatment of venous thromboembolism and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, the application of thrombin inhibitors in patients with MHV is contraindicated because of the RE-ALIGN trial results, and FXa inhibitors are not recommended. Considering the mechanism underlying coagulation, it may be more efficient to inhibit the upstream coagulation FXa than thrombin. Recently, several preclinical and clinical investigations have looked into the role of FXa inhibitors in patients with MHVs, and have provided some encouraging evidence. Herein, we review the completed and ongoing clinical trials, and express our opinion that the following patients with a low risk of thromboembolic events should be considered for treatment with FXa inhibitors: patients with MHVs replacement 3 months postoperatively, patients with isolated aortic valve replacement, patients with a new, low thrombogenicity mechanical valve, and Asian patients. We hope this summary will provide meaningful insights for further clinical investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.