Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35868974›Full record

SynthesisPain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses2022

A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Therapeutics for Acute Pain Management.

Nathan J Dreesmann, Han Su, Hilaire J Thompson

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan J DreesmannVirtual Therapeutics, Kirkland, Washington. Electronic address: njd.phd.rn@gmail.com.
Han SuCenter for Education in Health Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Hilaire J ThompsonBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Washington · USVirtual Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002318 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Megan Moore · 2017 to 2026
$8.4M
Aging and Informatics Training ProgramT32NR014833 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMPSON, HILAIRE J · 2014 to 2018
$982k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002318NINR NIH HHS T32 NR014833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review is to examine the delivery and clinical efficacy of virtual reality (VR) therapeutics for acute pain management in adults and identify practical considerations of VR deployment, as well as current gaps in the literature.

designA systematic review. DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Embase, Compendex, and Inspec was completed using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keyword search terms related to acute pain and VR. REVIEW/ANALYSIS

methodsA systematic review of all pertinent articles published between January 1, 2000, and August 1, 2020, was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

resultsTwenty-three articles met final inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Studies utilized VR in a variety of settings for wound care, procedure-induced pain, physical or occupational therapy, dental treatment or generalized acute pain. A likely mechanism by which VR promoted analgesia in these studies is distraction. Of the reviewed studies, 19 (83%) reported decreases in pain intensity while using VR compared with no VR use or with a non-VR group.

conclusionsThis systematic review found VR to be an effective tool for acute pain management. Findings from this review also underscore the importance of addressing the patient's sense of presence and levels of immersion, interaction, and interest when deploying VR. Future VR studies should consider incorporation of anxiety, presence, and VR side effect measures in addition to acute pain metrics.

Indexed as

Acute PainProcedural PainVirtual RealityAdultHumansPain ManagementPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID35868974
PMCPMC10748735
OpenAlexW4286257275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.