ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2023
Ultrahigh resolution whole body photon counting computed tomography as a novel versatile tool for translational research from mouse to man.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding Photon-Counting CT: Physics, Detector Technology, and Image Reconstructions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative image quality evaluation of unenhanced postmortem Photon-Counting CT and Energy-Integrating CT.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Seeing the Small to Prevent the Big: The Role of Cerebral Microvessels in Ischemic Stroke Etiology and Prevention.Stroke research and treatment · 2026Review
- Photon-counting CT in cancer radiotherapy: technological advances and clinical benefits.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X-ray computed tomography (CT) is a cardinal tool in clinical practice. It provides cross-sectional images within seconds. The recent introduction of clinical photon-counting CT allowed for an increase in spatial resolution by more than a factor of two resulting in a pixel size in the center of rotation of about 150 µm. This level of spatial resolution is in the order of dedicated preclinical micro-CT systems. However so far, the need for different dedicated clinical and preclinical systems often hinders the rapid translation of early research results to applications in men. This drawback might be overcome by ultra-high resolution (UHR) clinical photon-counting CT unifying preclinical and clinical research capabilities in a single machine. Herein, the prototype of a clinical UHR PCD CT (SOMATOM CounT, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) was used. The system comprises a conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) and a novel photon-counting detector (PCD). While the EID provides a pixel size of 0.6 mm in the centre of rotation, the PCD provides a pixel size of 0.25 mm. Additionally, it provides a quantification of photon energies by sorting them into up to four distinct energy bins. This acquisition of multi-energy data allows for a multitude of applications, e.g. pseudo-monochromatic imaging. In particular, we examine the relation between spatial resolution, image noise and administered radiation dose for a multitude of use-cases. These cases include ultra-high resolution and multi-energy acquisitions of mice administered with a prototype bismuth-based contrast agent (nanoPET Pharma, Berlin, Germany) as well as larger animals and actual patients. The clinical EID provides a spatial resolution of about 9 lp/cm (modulation transfer function at 10%, MTF
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.