Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35868830›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Prospective cohort study of the evaluation of patient benefit from the redevelopment of a complete national forensic mental health service: the Dundrum Forensic Redevelopment Evaluation Study (D-FOREST) protocol.

Mary Davoren, Ken O'Reilly, Damian Mohan, Harry G Kennedy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05074732 (Dundrum Forensic Redevelopment Evaluation Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05074732 recruitingnot on this map

Dundrum Forensic Redevelopment Evaluation Study: D-FOREST Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorHealth Service Executive, IrelandRan2019 to 2027Enrolled350ConditionsSchizophrenia, Forensic Psychiatry, Outcome Measure, Violence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary DavorenDundrum Centre for Forensic Excellence, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland davorem@tcd.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-8054-298X
Ken O'ReillyDundrum Centre for Forensic Excellence, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Damian MohanDundrum Centre for Forensic Excellence, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Harry G KennedyDundrum Centre for Forensic Excellence, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSecure forensic mental health services are low volume, high cost services. They offer care and treatment to mentally disordered offenders who pose a high risk of serious violence to others. It is therefore incumbent on these services to systematically evaluate the outcomes of the care and treatment they deliver to ensure patient benefit in multiple domains. These should include physical and mental health outcomes, as well as offending related outcomes. The aim of Dundrum Forensic Redevelopment Evaluation Study (D-FOREST) is to complete a structured evaluation study of a complete national forensic mental health service, at the time of redevelopment of the National Forensic Mental Health Service for the Ireland. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: D-FOREST is a multisite, prospective observational cohort study. The study uses a combination of baseline and repeated measures, to evaluate patient benefit from admissions to forensic settings. Patients will be rated for physical health, mental health, offending behaviours and other recovery measures relevant to the forensic hospital setting at admission to the hospital and 6 monthly thereafter.Lagged causal model analysis will be used to assess the existence and significance of potential directed relationships between the baseline measures of symptomatology of schizophrenia and violence risk and final outcome namely length of stay. Time intervals including length of stay will be measured by median and 95% CI using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses and survival analyses. Patient related measures will be rated as changes from baseline using general estimating equations for repeated measures, analysis of variance, analysis of covariance or logistic regression. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received approval from the Research Ethics and Effectiveness Committee of the National Forensic Mental Health Service, Ireland. Results will be made available to the funder and to forensic psychiatry researchers via international conferences and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05074732.

Indexed as

CriminalsMental DisordersMental Health ServicesForensic PsychiatryHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesViolenceDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYForensic psychiatryMENTAL HEALTHPersonality disordersPSYCHIATRYRisk management

Identifiers

PMID35868830
PMCPMC9315909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.