Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35868349›Full record

ArticleChest2022

Treatment Preference Among People With Cystic Fibrosis: The Importance of Reducing Treatment Burden.

Rory A Cameron, Daniel Office, Jessie Matthews, Mark Rowley, Janice Abbott, Nicholas J Simmonds, Jennifer A Whitty, Siobhán B Carr

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is associated with long-term reduction in use of chronic respiratory therapies in cystic fibrosis.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Considerations for the use of inhaled antibiotics forBMJ open respiratory research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rory A CameronNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England; National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, Cambridge, England. Electronic address: rory.cameron@uea.ac.uk.
Daniel OfficeAdult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, England.
Jessie MatthewsAdult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, England.
Mark Rowleypatient representative, York, England.
Janice AbbottSchool of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, England.
Nicholas J SimmondsAdult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, England; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, England.
Jennifer A WhittyNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England; National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, Cambridge, England; Evidera, London, England.
Siobhán B CarrNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, England; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, England.
Royal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Central Lancashire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing consensus that the perspective of the patient should be considered in the evaluation of novel interventions. RESEARCH QUESTION: What treatment outcomes matter to people with cystic fibrosis (CF), and what trade-offs would they make to realize these outcomes? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsAdults attending a specialist CF center were invited to complete an online discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE required participants to evaluate hypothetical CF treatment profiles, defined by impact on lung function, pulmonary exacerbations, abdominal symptoms, life expectancy, quality of life, inhaled medicine usage, and physiotherapy requirement. Choice data were analyzed, using multinomial logit and latent class models.

resultsOne hundred and three people with CF completed the survey (median age, 35 years; range, 18-76 years); 52% were female; mean FEV

interpretationThe relative importance of treatment burden to people with CF, compared with life expectancy and lung function, suggests it should be routinely captured in clinical trials as an important secondary outcome measure. When considering the patient perspective, it is important that decision-makers recognize that the values of people with CF are not homogeneous.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisAdultCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorFemaleHumansLungMaleQuality of LifeRespiratory Function TestsCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorCFTR modulatorscystic fibrosisdiscrete choice experimentpatient and public involvementpatient preferencetreatment burden

Identifiers

PMID35868349
PMCPMC9773229
OpenAlexW4286256913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.