Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35868257›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2023

DNA methylation subclasses predict the benefit from gross total tumor resection in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients.

Richard Drexler, Ulrich Schüller, Alicia Eckhardt, Katharina Filipski, Tabea I Hartung, Patrick N Harter, Iris Divé, Marie-Therese Forster, Marcus Czabanka, Claudius Jelgersma and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Contemporary surgical strategies for resection of intracranial gliomas.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Promoter Methylation-Expression Coupling of Gliogenesis Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard DrexlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ulrich SchüllerInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8731-1121
Alicia EckhardtDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Research Institute Children's Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina FilipskiNeurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Tabea I HartungNeurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Patrick N HarterNeurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Iris DivéDr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marie-Therese ForsterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7055-543X
Marcus CzabankaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Claudius JelgersmaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Julia OnkenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Peter VajkoczyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
David CapperDepartment of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz, Berlin, Germany.
Christin SiewertDepartment of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas SauvignyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katrin LamszusDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Manfred WestphalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3483-6335
Lasse DührsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Franz L RicklefsDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-6930
Universität Hamburg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA methylation-based tumor classification allows an enhanced distinction into subgroups of glioblastoma. However, the clinical benefit of DNA methylation-based stratification of glioblastomas remains inconclusive.

methodsMulticentric cohort study including 430 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma subjected to global DNA methylation profiling. Outcome measures included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), prognostic relevance of EOR and MGMT promoter methylation status as well as a surgical benefit for recurrent glioblastoma.

results345 patients (80.2%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 305 patients received combined adjuvant therapy. DNA methylation subclasses RTK I, RTK II, and mesenchymal (MES) revealed no significant survival differences (RTK I: Ref.; RTK II: HR 0.9 [95% CI, 0.64-1.28]; p = 0.56; MES: 0.69 [0.47-1.02]; p = 0.06). Patients with RTK I (GTR/near GTR: Ref.; PR: HR 2.87 [95% CI, 1.36-6.08]; p < 0.01) or RTK II (GTR/near GTR: Ref.; PR: HR 5.09 [95% CI, 2.80-9.26]; p < 0.01) tumors who underwent gross-total resection (GTR) or near GTR had a longer OS and PFS than partially resected patients. The MES subclass showed no survival benefit for a maximized EOR (GTR/near GTR: Ref.; PR: HR 1.45 [95% CI, 0.68-3.09]; p = 0.33). Therapy response predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation was evident for RTK I (HR 0.37 [95% CI, 0.19-0.71]; p < 0.01) and RTK II (HR 0.56 [95% CI, 0.34-0.91]; p = 0.02) but not the MES subclass (HR 0.52 [95% CI, 0.27-1.02]; p = 0.06). For local recurrence (n = 112), re-resection conveyed a progression-to-overall survival (POS) benefit (p < 0.01), which was evident in RTK I (p = 0.03) and RTK II (p < 0.01) tumors, but not in MES tumors (p = 0.33).

conclusionWe demonstrate a survival benefit from maximized EOR for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastomas of the RTK I and RTK II but not the MES subclass. Hence, it needs to be debated whether the MES subclass should be treated with maximal surgical resection, especially when located in eloquent areas and at time of recurrence.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaCohort StudiesDNA MethylationHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesDNA methylationextent of resectiongbmglioblastomagliomasubgroup

Identifiers

PMID35868257
PMCPMC9925709
OpenAlexW4286615483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.