ArticleNeurobiology of aging2022
Metacognition, cortical thickness, and tauopathy in aging.
Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trajectories of Self-Awareness Across the Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum: A Systematic Review of Its Potential Contribution to Early Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dissociable Mechanisms Underlie Differences Between Memory and Metamemory in Older Adults: The Differentiating Role of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms.Hippocampus · 2026Article
- Voxel- and surface-based morphometry in the cortical thickness and cortical and subcortical gray matter volume in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Subjective cognitive decline: Memory complaints, cognitive awareness, and metacognition.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Review
- Diabetes accelerates Alzheimer's disease progression in the first year post mild cognitive impairment diagnosis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Biomarkers of Neurodegeneration in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: An Integrative Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- A multidimensional model of memory complaints in older individuals and the associated hub regions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- A robust harmonization approach for cognitive data from multiple aging and dementia cohorts.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated self-rating of cognitive task performance (self-appraisal) and the difference between self-rating and actual task performance (appraisal discrepancy) in cognitively healthy older adults and their relationship with cortical thickness and Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers, amyloid and tau. All participants (N = 151) underwent neuropsychological testing and 1.5T structural magnetic resonance imaging. A subset (N = 66) received amyloid-PET with [11C] PiB and tau-PET with [18F] Flortaucipir. We found that worse performers had lower self-appraisal ratings, but still overestimated their performance, consistent with the Dunning-Kruger effect. Self-appraisal rating and appraisal discrepancy revealed distinct relationships with cortical thickness and AD pathology. Greater appraisal discrepancy, indicating overestimation, was related to thinning of inferior-lateral temporal, fusiform, and rostral anterior cingulate cortices. Lower self-appraisal was associated with higher entorhinal and inferior temporal tau. These results suggest that overestimation could implicate structural atrophy beyond AD pathology, while lower self-appraisal could indicate early behavioral alteration due to AD pathology, supporting the notion of subjective cognitive decline prior to objective deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.