ArticlePloS one2022
Classification of motor imagery EEG using deep learning increases performance in inefficient BCI users.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding Upper-Limb Motor Imagery from EEG Signals: A Systematic Review of Methods and Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Pooled it
- Deep Learning for Ear-EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface: A Systematic Comparison and Design Insights.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Noninvasive Intelligent Brain-Metasurface System for Real-Time Electromagnetic Wave Manipulation.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Improving motor imagery decoding methods for an EEG-based mobile brain-computer interface in the context of the 2024 Cybathlon.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- EEG coherence signatures of sport-specific motor imagery in elite freestyle skiing aerials athletes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Visual cues in MI-BCI induce biases in EEG classification models with deep learning but not with standard machine learning.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2026Article
- Robust Motor Imagery-Brain-Computer Interface Classification in Signal Degradation: A Multi-Window Ensemble Approach.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Schizophrenia Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks on EEG Data.Research square · 2025Article
- Review
- Deep Spectrogram Learning for Gunshot Classification: A Comparative Study of CNN Architectures and Time-Frequency Representations.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Hybrid CNN-GRU Models for Improved EEG Motor Imagery Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- What does my network learn? Assessing interpretability of deep learning for EEG.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Investigating singing imagery as an additional or alternative control task for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Temporal-spatial cross attention network for recognizing imagined characters.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Motor Imagery Classification Using Effective Channel Selection of Multichannel EEG.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- A Data Augmentation Method for Motor Imagery EEG Signals Based on DCGAN-GP Network.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Brain-machine interface based on deep learning to control asynchronously a lower-limb robotic exoskeleton: a case-of-study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Large scale investigation of the effect of gender on mu rhythm suppression in motor imagery brain-computer interfaces.Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal characteristics of cortical activities of REM sleep behavior disorder revealed by explainable machine learning using 3D convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Motor imagery EEG signal classification with a multivariate time series approach.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces (MI-BCIs) are AI-driven systems that capture brain activity patterns associated with mental imagination of movement and convert them into commands for external devices. Traditionally, MI-BCIs operate on Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, which require extensive signal processing and feature engineering to extract changes in sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). In recent years, Deep Learning (DL) models have gained popularity for EEG classification as they provide a solution for automatic extraction of spatio-temporal features in the signals. However, past BCI studies that employed DL models, only attempted them with a small group of participants, without investigating the effectiveness of this approach for different user groups such as inefficient users. BCI inefficiency is a known and unsolved problem within BCI literature, generally defined as the inability of the user to produce the desired SMR patterns for the BCI classifier. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of DL models in capturing MI features particularly in the inefficient users. EEG signals from 54 subjects who performed a MI task of left- or right-hand grasp were recorded to compare the performance of two classification approaches; a ML approach vs. a DL approach. In the ML approach, Common Spatial Patterns (CSP) was used for feature extraction and then Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) model was employed for binary classification of the MI task. In the DL approach, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model was constructed on the raw EEG signals. Additionally, subjects were divided into high vs. low performers based on their online BCI accuracy and the difference between the two classifiers' performance was compared between groups. Our results showed that the CNN model improved the classification accuracy for all subjects within the range of 2.37 to 28.28%, but more importantly, this improvement was significantly larger for low performers. Our findings show promise for employment of DL models on raw EEG signals in future MI-BCI systems, particularly for BCI inefficient users who are unable to produce desired sensorimotor patterns for conventional ML approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.