Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35867670›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Demographic profiles of contact lens wearers and their association with lens wear characteristics in Trinidad and Tobago: A retrospective study.

Ngozika E Ezinne, Dipesh Bhattarai, Kingsley K Ekemiri, Gabrielle N Harbajan, Anesha C Crooks, Khathutshelo P Mashige, Alex A Ilechie, Ferial M Zeried, Uchechukwu L Osuagwu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ngozika E EzinneOptometry Unit, Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Dipesh BhattaraiSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Kingsley K EkemiriOptometry Unit, Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Gabrielle N HarbajanOptometry Unit, Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Anesha C CrooksOptometry Unit, Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Khathutshelo P MashigeAfrican Vision Research Institute (AVRI), Discipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8199-0891
Alex A IlechieDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Ferial M ZeriedDepartment of Optometry & Vision Sciences College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Ilesha, Saudi Arabia.
Uchechukwu L OsuagwuTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1727-6914
University of the West Indies · TTAfrica Health Research Institute · ZADeakin University · AUKing Saud University · SATranslational Research Institute · AUUniversity of Cape Coast · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContact lenses (CL) remain a popular mode of refractive error correction globally and in the Caribbean, mostly among young people. However, no data on the characteristics of the CL population wearers in the Caribbean is available. This study reported on the characteristics of CL wearers and the associated factors in Trinidad and Tobago (T&T).

methodsThis retrospective study reviewed the clinical records of 243 CL wearers who attended the University of the West Indies (UWI) optometry clinic between 2017 and 2018. Data on their demographic profiles, CL wearing characteristics including lens type, material, purpose of wear, replacement schedule and lens care systems were extracted and analyzed. The associations between the demographic characteristics and CL wearing characteristics were also determined.

resultsAbout half of the CL wearers used them for fashion (more among those aged 18 to 30 years, 61.0%), therapeutic (more among those <18 years, 43.8%, P = 0.001) and refractive error correction purposes (more in those >40 years, P = 0.001). Females were more likely to use CLs for fashion compared with males (67.0% versus 40.7%). Age (P<0.0005) and gender (P = 0.030) were associated with the lens materials. Those aged 18-30 years were more likely use hydrogels compared with the younger ones (64.1% versus 25.0%). Rigid gas permeable (RGP) CL use was more common in males than females (21.8% versus 10.9%, P = 0.031). Daily disposables were predominantly used by younger respondents (18-30 years old, 31.3%, P < 0.001) and more in females than males (66.7% vs 49.4%, P = 0.040).

conclusionThe study found that the CL appears to be more commonly worn for fashion in younger females and for refractive error correction in older males. Age, gender, and employment status were the main determinants of lens wear among respondents attending the university clinic in T&T.

Indexed as

Contact LensesContact Lenses, HydrophilicRefractive ErrorsAdolescentAdultAgedDemographyFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTrinidad and TobagoYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35867670
PMCPMC9307171
OpenAlexW4286587173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.