ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022
Subtyping Evaluation of
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Oxford Nanopore Technologies workflows for genomic epidemiology of outbreak-associated bacterial isolates in the clinical setting.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10 sequencing enables accurate cgMLST-based bacterial outbreak investigation ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- First Data on WGS-Based Typing and Antimicrobial Resistance of HumanAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Benchmarking short and long read polishing tools for nanopore assemblies: achieving near-perfect genomes for outbreak isolates.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Real-Time Nanopore Q20+ Sequencing Enables Extremely Fast and Accurate Core Genome MLST Typing and Democratizes Access to High-Resolution Bacterial Pathogen Surveillance.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of five commercial DNA extraction kits usingAccess microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for public health surveillance and epidemiological investigation of foodborne pathogens predominantly relies on sequencing platforms that generate short reads. Continuous improvement of long-read nanopore sequencing, such as Oxford nanopore technologies (ONT), presents a potential for leveraging multiple advantages of the technology in public health and food industry settings, including rapid turnaround and onsite applicability in addition to superior read length. Using an established cohort of Salmonella Enteritidis isolates for subtyping evaluation, we assessed the technical readiness of nanopore long read sequencing for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis and core-genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) of a major foodborne pathogen. By multiplexing three isolates per flow cell, we generated sufficient sequencing depths in <7 h of sequencing for robust subtyping. SNP calls by ONT and Illumina reads were highly concordant despite homopolymer errors in ONT reads (R9.4.1 chemistry).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.