ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2022
Machine Learning-Enabled Multimodal Fusion of Intra-Atrial and Body Surface Signals in Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes.
Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02997254 (COMparison of Physiological Algorithms for Real-time Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COMparison of Physiological Algorithms for Real-time Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning and electrocardiography: systematic review of current techniques in cardiovascular disease diagnosis and management.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in the Heart of Medicine: A Systematic Approach to Transforming Arrhythmia Care with Intelligent Systems.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Pooled it
- AI-Driven Atrial Fibrillation Management: From Signal to Strategy.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
- Prognostic Modeling of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation Outcomes Using Machine Learning-Based Survival Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- AI-driven voltage map analysis for optimizing catheter ablation strategy in atrial fibrillation: a proof-of-concept study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Precision cardiovascular medicine with big data and AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Can atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes be properly predicted with electrocardiography and artificial intelligence?European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning for risk prediction of acute cardiac tamponade during atrial fibrillation ablation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: In Whom, When, and How?International journal of heart failure · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-driven Detection, Mapping, and Personalized Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026Review
- A paradigm shift toward full-cycle management of atrial fibrillation: integrating digital twins and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A Representation Fusion Framework for Decoupling Diagnostic Information in Multimodal Learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Machine Learning and Arrhythmia: Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Detection and Management.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Pseudo datasets estimate feature attribution in artificial neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Atrial fibrillation in continuous flow-left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) patients: impact on pathophysiology.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025Review
- Integration of EHR and ECG Data for Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Stroke Patients.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Role of Computational Modelling in Enhancing Thermal Safety During Cardiac Ablation.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Stratification Based on Artificial Intelligence-Driven Analysis of the Electrophysiological Complexity.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Article
- Targeting the Substrate: Mechanism-Based Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning is a promising approach to personalize atrial fibrillation management strategies for patients after catheter ablation. Prior atrial fibrillation ablation outcome prediction studies applied classical machine learning methods to hand-crafted clinical scores, and none have leveraged intracardiac electrograms or 12-lead surface electrocardiograms for outcome prediction. We hypothesized that (1) machine learning models trained on electrograms or electrocardiogram (ECG) signals can perform better at predicting patient outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation than existing clinical scores and (2) multimodal fusion of electrogram, ECG, and clinical features can further improve the prediction of patient outcomes.
methodsConsecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation between 2015 and 2017 with panoramic left atrial electrogram before ablation and clinical follow-up for at least 1 year following ablation were included. Convolutional neural network and a novel multimodal fusion framework were developed for predicting 1-year atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation from electrogram, ECG signals, and clinical features. The models were trained and validated using 10-fold cross-validation on patient-level splits.
resultsOne hundred fifty-six patients (64.5±10.5 years, 74% male, 42% paroxysmal) were analyzed. Using electrogram signals alone, the convolutional neural network achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.731, outperforming the existing APPLE scores (AUROC=0.644) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (AUROC=0.650). Similarly using 12-lead ECG alone, the convolutional neural network achieved an AUROC of 0.767. Combining electrogram, ECG, and clinical features, the fusion model achieved an AUROC of 0.859, outperforming single and dual modality models.
conclusionsDeep neural networks trained on electrogram or ECG signals improved the prediction of catheter ablation outcome compared with existing clinical scores, and fusion of electrogram, ECG, and clinical features further improved the prediction. This suggests the promise of using machine learning to help treatment planning for patients after catheter ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.