Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35867397›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2022

Machine Learning-Enabled Multimodal Fusion of Intra-Atrial and Body Surface Signals in Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes.

Siyi Tang, Orod Razeghi, Ridhima Kapoor, Mahmood I Alhusseini, Muhammad Fazal, Albert J Rogers, Miguel Rodrigo Bort, Paul Clopton, Paul J Wang, Daniel L Rubin and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02997254 (COMparison of Physiological Algorithms for Real-time Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02997254 recruitingnot on this map

COMparison of Physiological Algorithms for Real-time Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation

TypeobservationalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2016 to 2027Enrolled1,000ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation, Abnormal Heart Rhythms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Atrial fibrillation in continuous flow-left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) patients: impact on pathophysiology.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Role of Computational Modelling in Enhancing Thermal Safety During Cardiac Ablation.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Siyi TangDepartment of Electrical Engineering (S.T.), Stanford University, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-7504-5885
Orod RazeghiUniversity College London, Centre for Advanced Research Computing, United Kingdom (O.R.).ORCID 0000-0003-4989-5565
Ridhima KapoorDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K., M.I.A., M.F., A.J.R., M.R.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N., T.B), Stanford University, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-6097-7441
Mahmood I AlhusseiniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K., M.I.A., M.F., A.J.R., M.R.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N., T.B), Stanford University, CA.
Muhammad FazalDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K., M.I.A., M.F., A.J.R., M.R.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N., T.B), Stanford University, CA.
Albert J RogersDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K., M.I.A., M.F., A.J.R., M.R.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N., T.B), Stanford University, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-6585-534X
Miguel Rodrigo BortDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K., M.I.A., M.F., A.J.R., M.R.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N., T.B), Stanford University, CA.
Paul CloptonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K., M.I.A., M.F., A.J.R., M.R.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N., T.B), Stanford University, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0642-0861
Paul J WangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K., M.I.A., M.F., A.J.R., M.R.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N., T.B), Stanford University, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-5877
Daniel L RubinDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science (D.L.R.), Stanford University, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-4369
Sanjiv M NarayanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K., M.I.A., M.F., A.J.R., M.R.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N., T.B), Stanford University, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-7552-5053
Tina BaykanerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.K., M.I.A., M.F., A.J.R., M.R.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N., T.B), Stanford University, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0476-2972
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USStanford University · USCentre for Development of Advanced Computing · INMACOM (United States) · US

Funding

The Dynamics of Human Atrial FibrillationR01HL083359 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Sanjiv M Narayan · 2008 to 2026
$7.9M
Machine Learning in Atrial FibrillationR01HL149134 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NARAYAN, SANJIV M · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
INTEGRATING OMICS AND QUANTITATIVE IMAGING DATA IN CO-CLINICAL TRIALS TO PREDICT TREATMENT RESPONSE IN TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCERU24CA226110 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LEWIS, MICHAEL T., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Qualification and Deployment of Imaging Biomarkers of Cancer Treatment ResponseU01CA190214 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2020
$3.1M
Computing, Optimizing, and Evaluating Quantitative Cancer Imaging BiomarkersU01CA187947 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NAPEL, SANDY A., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
The Maintenance of Human Atrial FibrillationK24HL103800 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NARAYAN, SANJIV M · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
Distributed Learning of Deep Learning Models for Cancer ResearchU01CA242879 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE, RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
Deep Neural Networks To Treat Atrial FibrillationK23HL145017 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BAYKANER, TINA · 2019 to 2023
$968k
The Pathophysiology of T-wave AlternansK23HL070529 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI NARAYAN, SANJIV M · 2001 to 2005
$716k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA187947NCI NIH HHS U01 CA190214NCI NIH HHS U01 CA242879NCI NIH HHS U24 CA226110NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL070529NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL145017NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL103800NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083359NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning is a promising approach to personalize atrial fibrillation management strategies for patients after catheter ablation. Prior atrial fibrillation ablation outcome prediction studies applied classical machine learning methods to hand-crafted clinical scores, and none have leveraged intracardiac electrograms or 12-lead surface electrocardiograms for outcome prediction. We hypothesized that (1) machine learning models trained on electrograms or electrocardiogram (ECG) signals can perform better at predicting patient outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation than existing clinical scores and (2) multimodal fusion of electrogram, ECG, and clinical features can further improve the prediction of patient outcomes.

methodsConsecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation between 2015 and 2017 with panoramic left atrial electrogram before ablation and clinical follow-up for at least 1 year following ablation were included. Convolutional neural network and a novel multimodal fusion framework were developed for predicting 1-year atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation from electrogram, ECG signals, and clinical features. The models were trained and validated using 10-fold cross-validation on patient-level splits.

resultsOne hundred fifty-six patients (64.5±10.5 years, 74% male, 42% paroxysmal) were analyzed. Using electrogram signals alone, the convolutional neural network achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.731, outperforming the existing APPLE scores (AUROC=0.644) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (AUROC=0.650). Similarly using 12-lead ECG alone, the convolutional neural network achieved an AUROC of 0.767. Combining electrogram, ECG, and clinical features, the fusion model achieved an AUROC of 0.859, outperforming single and dual modality models.

conclusionsDeep neural networks trained on electrogram or ECG signals improved the prediction of catheter ablation outcome compared with existing clinical scores, and fusion of electrogram, ECG, and clinical features further improved the prediction. This suggests the promise of using machine learning to help treatment planning for patients after catheter ablation.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationFemaleHeart AtriaHumansMachine LearningMalePredictive Value of TestsRecurrenceTreatment Outcomeatrial fibrillationcardiac electrophysiologycatheter ablationMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35867397
PMCPMC9972736
OpenAlexW4286562028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.