Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35867353›Full record

ArticleACS nano2022

Tracking Nanoparticle Degradation across Fuel Cell Electrodes by Automated Analytical Electron Microscopy.

Haoran Yu, Michael J Zachman, Kimberly S Reeves, Jae Hyung Park, Nancy N Kariuki, Leiming Hu, Rangachary Mukundan, Kenneth C Neyerlin, Deborah J Myers, David A Cullen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Perspective intoThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026
    Review
  4. Intelligent Systems for Inorganic Nanomaterial Synthesis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Chemical reviews · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Haoran YuCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7304-2840
Michael J ZachmanCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1910-1357
Kimberly S ReevesCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.
Jae Hyung ParkChemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States.
Nancy N KariukiChemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States.
Leiming HuChemistry and Nanoscience Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.
Rangachary MukundanMaterials Physics and Applications Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, United States.
Kenneth C NeyerlinChemistry and Nanoscience Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6753-9698
Deborah J MyersChemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-3916
David A CullenCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2593-7866
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USArgonne National Laboratory · USNational Laboratory of the Rockies · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles are an important class of materials that exhibit special properties arising from their high surface area-to-volume ratio. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) has played an important role in nanoparticle characterization, owing to its high spatial resolution, which allows direct visualization of composition and morphology with atomic precision. This typically comes at the cost of sample size, potentially limiting the accuracy and relevance of STEM results, as well as the ability to meaningfully track changes in properties that vary spatially. In this work, automated STEM data acquisition and analysis techniques are employed that enable physical and compositional properties of nanoparticles to be obtained at high resolution over length scales on the order of microns. This is demonstrated by studying the localized effects of potential cycling on electrocatalyst degradation across proton exchange membrane fuel cell cathodes. In contrast to conventional, manual STEM measurements, which produce particle size distributions representing hundreds of particles, these high-throughput automated methods capture tens of thousands of particles and enable nanoparticle size, number density, and composition to be measured as a function of position within the cathode. Comparing the properties of pristine and degraded fuel cells provides statistically robust evidence for the inhomogeneous nature of catalyst degradation across electrodes. These results demonstrate how high-throughput automated STEM techniques can be utilized to investigate local phenomena occurring in nanoparticle systems employed in practical devices.

Indexed as

automationnanoparticlesproton exchange membrane fuel cellPythonscanning transmission electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID35867353
PMCPMC9413405
OpenAlexW4286559919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.