Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35867338›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2022

Empowering interventions for people living with dementia: A European survey.

Charlotte T M van Corven, Annemiek Bielderman, Ana Diaz Ponce, Dianne Gove, Jean Georges, Maud J L Graff, Debby L Gerritsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Agitation in dementia: Evidence-based consensus recommendations.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Living Well with Dementia: Feeling Empowered through Interaction with Their Social Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte T M van CorvenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4190-5573
Annemiek BieldermanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ana Diaz PonceAlzheimer Europe, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Dianne GoveAlzheimer Europe, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Jean GeorgesAlzheimer Europe, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Maud J L GraffScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare and Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Debby L GerritsenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAlzheimer Europe · LU

Funding

Alzheimer NederlandZonMw
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe aim to identify existing empowerment interventions for people living with dementia and to explore which used interventions and projects are considered empowering and why.

designThis was an online survey.

methodsWe conducted an online survey between May 2018 and July 2018 amongst professionals interested in dementia care in Europe. Interventions were clustered within the ecological model for health promotion. Reasons from respondents as to why they considered interventions to be empowering were analysed and structured according to a recently developed conceptual framework of empowerment for people living with dementia.

resultsSeventy-three respondents from 23 countries together mentioned 98 interventions or projects, of which 90 were unique. Interventions focused on the (inter)personal (n = 54), organizational (n = 15), communal (n = 6) and societal (n = 15) levels. A broad range of interventions were considered empowering, but no interventions were specifically developed for, nor aimed at, empowerment. Reasons as to why respondents considered these interventions as empowering fitted the framework's domains.

conclusionThis European survey provides insights into interventions considered empowering for people living with dementia. An important step that needs to be taken is to develop and test interventions that specifically aim to promote empowerment for people living with dementia. IMPACT: Empowerment may encourage people with dementia to live the life they choose, and focus on what is possible, instead of what is no longer possible. Many interventions are considered as empowering for people living with dementia, however no interventions could be identified that were specifically developed for or aimed at empowerment. This study shows that for promoting empowerment, it is necessary to develop and test interventions that specifically aim for empowerment, do this in collaboration with relevant stakeholders, and in this way support people living with dementia to live according to their competencies, talents and wishes.

Indexed as

DementiaHealth PromotionEuropeHumansPower, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnairescaregivingdementiapsychosocial nursingquality of life

Identifiers

PMID35867338
PMCPMC9796734
OpenAlexW4286562070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.