Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35867276›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2022

Effects of Elobixibat in Patients with Diabetes and Concomitant Chronic Constipation: an 8-week, Prospective, Single-center, Single-arm Study.

Yoshiaki Hishida, Yoshio Nagai, Hidekazu Tsukiyama, Yuta Nakamura, Tomoko Nakagawa, Sonoko Ishizaki, Yasushi Tanaka, Masakatsu Sone

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiaki HishidaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1, Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Yoshio NagaiDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1, Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan. yoshio-nagai@kantoh.johas.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-6545
Hidekazu TsukiyamaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1, Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Yuta NakamuraDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1, Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Tomoko NakagawaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1, Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Sonoko IshizakiMedical Department, EA Pharma Co., Ltd., 2-1-1, Irifune, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0042, Japan.
Yasushi TanakaDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1, Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Masakatsu SoneDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1, Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
St. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPEA Pharma (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of elobixibat in patients with diabetes and concomitant chronic constipation.

methodsThis was a single-center, single-arm study. Thirty-three patients with diabetes and chronic constipation, as defined by the Rome IV criteria, were treated with elobixibat (10 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Patients recorded stool properties, including spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) and stool consistency, according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). Quality of life for constipation was evaluated with the Japanese version of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (JPAC-QOL).

resultsOf the 33 eligible patients, 30 completed the study. Elobixibat significantly increased the median (interquartile range) frequency of SBMs per week, from 5.0 (3.0-7.0) at baseline to 6.0 (4.0-7.0] at week 8 (p = 0.030). After 8 weeks, the BSFS score approached 4; the score for normal stool consistency and the JPAC-QOL score significantly improved from 1.05 ± 0.40 at baseline to 0.94 ± 0.53 (p = 0.048); and glycated albumin and serum lipid profiles significantly improved. Stratified analysis revealed that SBMs increased especially in patients with low SBM frequency, in particular in women, older adults, patients without overweight, patients with a long duration of constipation, and patients with diabetic neuropathy. No serious adverse events occurred.

conclusionsAmong patients with diabetes who met the Rome IV criteria for constipation, elobixibat was effective, especially in those with few SBMs at baseline. Improvements in lipid profiles could be an advantage of elobixibat compared with other laxatives. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials registration number: jRCTs031190092.

Indexed as

ConstipationDiabetes MellitusDipeptidesThiazepinesAgedDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleHumansLipidsMaleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeDipeptideselobixibatLipidsThiazepinesBristol Stool Form ScaleChronic constipationDiabetesElobixibatLaxativePatient Assessment of Constipation Quality of LifeRome IV criteria

Identifiers

PMID35867276
PMCPMC9402500
OpenAlexW4286487546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.