Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35867180›Full record

SynthesisPituitary2022

Determinants of skeletal fragility in acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cláudia Ribeiro de Moura, Sara Campos Lopes, Ana Margarida Monteiro

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The acromegaly patient experience: burden of treatment and quality of life.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Acromegaly and Bone: An Update.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Acromegaly and the long-term fracture risk of the vertebra and hip: a national cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cláudia Ribeiro de Moura *School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8545-7381
Sara Campos Lopes *Endocrinology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal. saragclopes@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-5938
Ana Margarida MonteiroEndocrinology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9820-1940
Hospital Braga · PTUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVertebral fractures (VFs) are a potential complication in acromegaly. However, the etiology of this skeletal fragility is unknown. This review aimed to evaluate the effect of acromegaly on VFs, bone turnover, areal bone mineral density (aBMD), and bone quality/microarchitecture. The effect of disease activity and gonadal status in these determinants of skeletal fragility was also evaluated.

methodsArticles published in English until September 6, 2020 on PubMed and Embase that reported at least one determinant of skeletal fragility in acromegalic patients, were included. Odds ratio (OR) to evaluate the risk of VFs and the standardized mean difference (SMD) to evaluate bone turnover, aBMD and bone quality/microarchitecture were calculated.

resultsFifty-eight studies met eligibility criteria, assembling a total of 2412 acromegalic patients. Of these, 49 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Acromegalic patients, when compared to non-acromegalic patients, had higher risk of VFs [OR 7.00; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.80-17.52; p < 0.0001], higher bone formation (SMD 1.14; 95% CI 0.69-1.59; p < 0.00001), higher bone resorption (SMD 0.60; 95% CI 0.09-1.10; p = 0.02) and higher aBMD at the femoral neck (SMD 0.36; 95% CI 0.15-0.57; p = 0.0009). No significant differences were found regarding aBMD at lumbar spine. Considering the results of the different techniques evaluating bone quality/microarchitecture, the main reported alterations were a decrease in trabecular bone thickness and density, and an increase in trabecular separation. The presence of active disease and/or hypogonadism were associated with worst results.

conclusionPatients with acromegaly are at increased risk of VFs, mainly because of deterioration in bone microarchitecture.

Indexed as

AcromegalyHypogonadismSpinal FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityHumansLumbar VertebraeAcromegalyCortical boneMicroarchitectureSkeletal fragilityTrabecular boneVertebral fractures

Identifiers

PMID35867180
OpenAlexW4286560839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.