Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35867175›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2023

Mental sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic in children with and without complex medical histories and their parents: well-being prior to the outbreak and at four time-points throughout 2020 and 2021.

Melanie Ehrler, Cornelia F Hagmann, Alexandra Stoeckli, Oliver Kretschmar, Markus A Landolt, Beatrice Latal, Flavia M Wehrle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [A three-country comparison of mental health and treatment options of children and adolescents with mental health problems in times after the COVID-19 pandemic].Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melanie EhrlerChild Development Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cornelia F HagmannChildren's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexandra StoeckliDepartment of Neonatology and Intensive Care, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oliver KretschmarChildren's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus A LandoltChildren's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Beatrice LatalChild Development Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Flavia M WehrleChild Development Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. flavia.wehrle@kispi.uzh.ch.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 320030_169733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to understand the long-term mental sequelae for families over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic by longitudinally investigating the well-being of children with and without complex medical histories and their parents. Well-being of 200 children (between 7 and 18 years of age; 73 typically developing, 46 born very preterm, 73 with complex congenital heart disease) and 175 of their parents was assessed prior to and during the first (April-May 2020), second (October-November 2020), third (April-May 2021), and fourth wave (October-November 2021) of the pandemic with standardized questionnaires. Linear mixed models were used to investigate longitudinal changes in child and parent well-being compared to before the pandemic. Social and COVID-19-specific determinants were investigated as predictors of impaired well-being. To illustrate clinical relevance, the proportion of children and parents scoring > 1 SD below normative mean/median was reported. Compared to before the pandemic, child proxy-reported well-being was lower during the first but not the second, third, and fourth waves. Child self-reported well-being was not lower during the pandemic compared to before. Parent well-being dropped during the first wave and remained low throughout the subsequent waves. Proxy-reported child and self-reported parent well-being was lower in families with sparse social support and poor family functioning. Parents of typically developing children reported lower well-being than parents of children born very preterm or with a complex congenital heart disease. In November 2021, 20% of children (both self- and proxy-report) and 24% of parents scored below the normal range compared to 11% (child self-report), 10% (child proxy-report), and 16% (parent self-report), respectively, before the pandemic. The pandemic continues to impact the well-being of parents of school-aged children with and without complex medical histories more than 1 year after its outbreak. Children's well-being was specifically affected during the first wave of the pandemic and has recovered thereafter. Families with sparse social support and poor family functioning are particularly at risk for compromised well-being and support should be provided to them.

Indexed as

COVID-19Heart Defects, CongenitalChildDisease ProgressionHumansInfant, NewbornPandemicsParent-Child RelationsParentsChildrenCOVID-19 pandemicFamilyParentsQuality of lifeWell-being

Identifiers

PMID35867175
PMCPMC9305026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.