Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35867155›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2023

Supporting employees with mental illness and reducing mental illness-related stigma in the workplace: an expert survey.

Bridget Hogg, Ana Moreno-Alcázar, Mónika Ditta Tóth, Ilinca Serbanescu, Birgit Aust, Caleb Leduc, Charlotte Paterson, Fotini Tsantilla, Kahar Abdulla, Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 19 institutions in 12 countries.

Bridget HoggCentre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Moreno-AlcázarCentre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Mónika Ditta TóthInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University, Semmelweis Egyetem Magatartástudományi Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.
Ilinca SerbanescuFaculty of Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Birgit AustNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Caleb LeducSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Charlotte PatersonNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.
Fotini TsantillaLUCAS, Center for Care Research and Consultancy, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Kahar AbdullaEuropean Alliance Against Depression E.V, Leipzig, Germany.
Arlinda Cerga-PashojaPopulation Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England.
Johanna Cresswell-SmithFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Naim FanajMental Health Center, Prizren, Kosovo.
Andia MeksiInstitute of Public Health, Tirane, Albania.
Doireann Ni DhalaighNational Suicide Research Foundation, Cork, Ireland.
Hanna ReichDepression Research Centre of the German Depression Foundation, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Victoria RossAustralian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Sarita SanchesPhrenos Center of Expertise for Severe Mental Illness, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Katherine ThomsonInternational Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP), Washington, DC, USA.
Chantal Van AudenhoveLUCAS, Center for Care Research and Consultancy, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Victor PérezCentre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Ella ArensmanSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Gyorgy PureblInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University, Semmelweis Egyetem Magatartástudományi Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. purebl.gyorgy@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9750-2001
Benedikt L AmannCentre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
MENTUPP consortium members
Clinical Research Consortium · USGriffith University · AUKU Leuven · BENational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKSemmelweis University · HUUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESAmerican Foundation for Suicide Prevention · USEuropean Alliance Against Depression · DEFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHeidelberg University · DEInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESNational Suicide Research Foundation · IEPublic Health England · GBUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Clinical Center of Kosovo · XKUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Medicine Tirana · ALUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 137Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An expert survey was designed to support the development of a workplace-based multi-country intervention tackling depression, anxiety, and mental illness-related stigma in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Academic experts and representatives of SME organisations, specific sector organisations, labour or advocacy groups, and occupational health organisations, were contacted across eight European countries and Australia. The survey comprised closed and open text questions to assess expert opinion about interventions for employees with mental health difficulties, interventions supporting their managers, and anti-stigma interventions. The survey was available in six languages. The online platform Qualtrics was used for data collection. Quantitative data was analysed through descriptive statistics and qualitative data was analysed through thematic analysis. Sixty-five of 146 experts responded, representing a 42% response rate. Results showed only 26.2% of experts agreed that employees could speak openly about mental health issues, and 81.5% of experts indicated a large or medium unmet need for support for employees with mental health issues. Psychoeducational materials, face-to-face workshops and interventions based on cognitive behavioural therapy were ranked most likely to be taken up by employees. Experts rated as most useful for managers' guidelines on how to act if an employee has mental health issues (67.7%). The greatest number of experts indicated workshops of people with lived experience of mental illness (80.0%) and awareness campaigns (78.5%) were most required to tackle stigma. Responses were consistent between experts from different countries and areas of expertise. Experts in this multinational survey assessed that interventions supporting mental health in the workplace and tackling stigma are greatly needed. A multicomponent intervention with a wide range of materials and tools is supported.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersHumansMental HealthSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesWorking ConditionsWorkplaceAnxietyDepressionExpert surveyMental illnessSMEStigmaWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID35867155
PMCPMC9305029
OpenAlexW4286470720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.