SynthesisPediatric surgery international2022
Systematic appraisal of the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Hirschsprung's disease.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical practice guidelines in the management of pediatric foreign body aspiration and ingestion: a systematic evaluation using the AGREE II instrument.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSome guidelines for management of Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR, HD) have been developed, but their quality is vague. This study will systematically assess the quality of guidelines and analyze the key recommendations and the best evidence for guidelines.
methodsApplicable guidelines were retrieved using a systematic search of databases. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool was used to assess the quality of the guidelines. Then, the recommendations and evidence for the included guidelines were extracted and compared.
resultsA total of nine guidelines were included in this study, and only one had an overall standardized score of more than 60%, indicating that it is worthy of recommendation. The problems identified included ambiguous and low-quality evidence; obvious distributional heterogeneity among the recommendations; a lack of in-depth discussion on the interpretation of staging, diagnostic methods, conservative treatment, and surgical staging of disease.
conclusionThe quality of guidelines varies widely, and there is a lack of high-quality professional opinions and supporting evidence for the main recommendations. At present, only comprehensive guidelines can be considered high-quality and there is still room for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35867125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.