Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35867057›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Barriers to Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Multicenter Cohort.

Neehar D Parikh, Nabihah Tayob, Taim Al-Jarrah, Jennifer Kramer, Jennifer Melcher, Donna Smith, Patrick Marquardt, Po-Hong Liu, Runlong Tang, Fasiha Kanwal and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Receipt in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Neehar D ParikhDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Nabihah TayobDepartment of Biostatistics, Dana Farber Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Taim Al-JarrahDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Jennifer KramerCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Jennifer MelcherCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Donna SmithCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Patrick MarquardtDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Po-Hong LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Runlong TangFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Fasiha KanwalCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Amit G SingalDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USCenter for Innovation · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Tissue Analysis & Molecular Imaging CoreP30DK056338 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Hashem B El-Serag · 2001 to 2026
$28.3M
UT GASTROENTEROLOGY/HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007745 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Rodney E Infante · 1997 to 2026
$6.8M
Risk Stratification for and Early Detection of Liver CancerU01CA230997 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Jagpreet Chhatwal, Hashem B El-Serag · 2018 to 2026
$6.4M
Consortium on Translational Research in Early Detection of Liver Cancer:Data Management and Coordinating Center (DMCC)U24CA230144 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Ziding Feng · 2018 to 2026
$5.8M
Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)R01CA186566 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I., HASSAN, MANAL METWALLY · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Precision Risk Stratification and Screening for HCC among Patients with Cirrhosis in the United StatesU01CA230694 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SINGAL, AMIT · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NOVEL STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE LIVER CANCER SURVEILLANCE UPTAKE AND EARLY DETECTIONU01CA230669 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOK, ANNA S.F., SU, GRACE L. · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Multi-level Evaluation of Racial/ethnic Disparities in Liver Disease OutcomesR01CA256977 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI KANWAL, FASIHA, SINGAL, AMIT · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Precision Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with CirrhosisR01CA222900 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SINGAL, AMIT · 2018 to 2023
$2.4M
Biomarker screening algorithms for the improved early detection of hepatocellular carcinomaR01CA230503 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI TAYOB, NABIHAH · 2019 to 2025
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222900NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230503NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256977NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230669NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230694NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230997NCI NIH HHS U24 CA230144NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056338NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is underused in clinical practice, which may be owing to patient and clinician barriers. Objective: To characterize HCC surveillance barriers and associations with clinical outcomes in a multicenter cohort of patients with cirrhosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 5 medical centers in the United States. Patients with cirrhosis and newly diagnosed HCC treated from 2014 to 2018 were included. Data were analyzed from June 2021 to February 2022. Exposure: Surveillance completion in the 36-month period prior to HCC diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Surveillance receipt was classified as semiannual, annual, or no surveillance. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with semiannual surveillance. We conducted multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses to characterize associations between surveillance completion with curative treatment and overall survival. Results: A total 629 eligible patients (median [IQR] age, 63.6 [56.2-71.0] years; 491 [78.1%] men) were assessed, including 7 American Indian or Alaska Native patients (1.1%), 14 Asian patients (2.2), 176 Black patients (28.0%), 86 Hispanic patients (13.1%), and 340 White patients (54.1%). Nearly two-thirds of the cohort had no surveillance prior to HCC diagnosis (mean [range by site] 63.7% [37.9%-80.4%]), with a mean (range by site) of 14.0% (5.3%-33.3%) of patients having received semiannual surveillance and 22.3% (14.3%-28.8%) of patients having received annual surveillance. The most common reasons for no surveillance were lack of surveillance orders or nonadherence (mean [range by site], 82.4% [66.7%-92.4%], although a mean (range by site) of 17.6% (10.2%-22.1%) of patients had unrecognized cirrhosis at HCC presentation. Semiannual surveillance was associated with hepatitis B infection (odds ratio [OR], 3.06 [95% CI, 1.24-7.23]) and inversely associated with Black race (OR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.20-0.80]) and lack of cirrhosis recognition (OR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.46]). Semiannual HCC surveillance was significantly associated with curative treatment receipt (OR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.60-4.70]) but not overall survival (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.55-1.18]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with cirrhosis, HCC surveillance was underused in more than 80% of patients and associated with failures across the screening process. Dedicated programs to improve cirrhosis detection and HCC surveillance attainment are needed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35867057
PMCPMC9308050
OpenAlexW4286560499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.