ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022
Sociodemographic Survival Disparities for Lung Cancer in the United States, 2000-2016.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender disparities in the overall survival of patients with minimally invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Sexual dimorphism in cancer: molecular mechanisms and precision oncology perspectives.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival by Race and Ethnicity in California, 2014-2019 Differences by Sex and Smoking History.CHEST pulmonary · 2025Article
- The Current Roadmap of Lung Cancer Biology, Genomics and Racial Disparity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Describing the intersection of ethnicity and gender in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Recent Survival Gains in Stage IV NSCLC by Sociodemographic Strata.JTO clinical and research reports · 2025Article
- Attitudes regarding polygenic risk testing for lung cancer: a mixed-methods study.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025Article
- Common laboratory parameters as predictors of prognosis in primary lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Time-varying associations of patient and tumor characteristics with cancer survival: an analysis of SEER data across 14 cancer sites, 2004-2017.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Characterizing Lung Cancer Burden Among Asian-American Communities in Philadelphia.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- Survival Disparities among Cancer Patients Based on Mobility Patterns: A Population-Based Study.Health data science · 2024Article
- RE: Sociodemographic survival disparities for lung cancer in the United States, 2000-2016.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Clinical Characterization of the Expression of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 1 and Tumor Immunosuppression Caused by Ferroptosis of Neutrophils in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the impact of patient and tumor characteristics on lung cancer survival can help build personalized prognostic models and identify health disparities.
methodsWe identified 557 555 patients aged 25 years and older diagnosed with lung or bronchus carcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 2000-2016. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) for demographic (sex, age, race and ethnicity), tumor (stage, histology, year of diagnosis), and geographic characteristics (census tract-level urbanicity, socioeconomic status [SES]), as well as selected interactions, on the rate of lung cancer-specific death using multivariable proportional hazards models.
resultsWomen had a higher survival (lower hazard) of lung cancer-specific death than men (HR = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 0.83). Hazards differed by race and ethnicity. Regional (HR = 2.41, 95% CI = 2.37 to 2.44) and distant (HR = 6.61, 95% CI = 6.53 to 6.69) tumors were associated with a lower survival (higher hazard) than localized tumors. Small cell tumors were associated with a lower survival (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.20) than non-small cell tumors. Patients diagnosed after 2009 had lower hazards (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 085 to 0.86) than those diagnosed 2000-2009. Lung cancer-specific survival did not depend on urbanicity after adjusting for census tract-level SES, but survival decreased with decreasing census tract-level SES. Differences in survival between non-Hispanic Black and White patients were greater for younger patients and localized tumors and increased with census tract-level SES. Differences by sex were greatest for young patients and localized tumors.
conclusionsDisparities in survival after lung cancer diagnosis remain, with intersectional patterns suggesting differential access to and quality of care. Efforts are needed to ensure that high-risk groups receive guideline-concordant treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.