ArticleSystematic biology2023
ARPIP: Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction with Insertions and Deletions under the Poisson Indel Process.
Article in Systematic biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mutational biases and selection in mitochondrial genomes: insights from a comparative analysis of natural and laboratory populations of Caenorhabditis elegans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Exploring cooperation among social pathogens: a computational perspective.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction Provides Insights into the Structural Diversification and Neofunctionalization of T-superfamily Conotoxins in Conus.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- A trimer ancestral spike-based mRNA vaccine confers cross-generational protection against SADS-CoV.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Protein Structural Phylogenetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Review
- Algorithms to reconstruct past indels: The deletion-only parsimony problem.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Impact of Phylogenetic Method Choice on Indel Analyses in HIV-1 Subtype B.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- The Characterization of Ancient Methanococcales Malate Dehydrogenases Reveals That Strong Thermal Stability Prevents Unfolding Under Intense γ-Irradiation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Single-character insertion-deletion model preserves long indels in ancestral sequence reconstruction.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Applications of ancestral sequence reconstruction for understanding the evolution of plant specialized metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Insertions and Deletions: Computational Methods, Evolutionary Dynamics, and Biological Applications.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Review
- Please Mind the Gap: Indel-Aware Parsimony for Fast and Accurate Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction and Multiple Sequence Alignment Including Long Indels.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern phylogenetic methods allow inference of ancestral molecular sequences given an alignment and phylogeny relating present-day sequences. This provides insight into the evolutionary history of molecules, helping to understand gene function and to study biological processes such as adaptation and convergent evolution across a variety of applications. Here, we propose a dynamic programming algorithm for fast joint likelihood-based reconstruction of ancestral sequences under the Poisson Indel Process (PIP). Unlike previous approaches, our method, named ARPIP, enables the reconstruction with insertions and deletions based on an explicit indel model. Consequently, inferred indel events have an explicit biological interpretation. Likelihood computation is achieved in linear time with respect to the number of sequences. Our method consists of two steps, namely finding the most probable indel points and reconstructing ancestral sequences. First, we find the most likely indel points and prune the phylogeny to reflect the insertion and deletion events per site. Second, we infer the ancestral states on the pruned subtree in a manner similar to FastML. We applied ARPIP (Ancestral Reconstruction under PIP) on simulated data sets and on real data from the Betacoronavirus genus. ARPIP reconstructs both the indel events and substitutions with a high degree of accuracy. Our method fares well when compared to established state-of-the-art methods such as FastML and PAML. Moreover, the method can be extended to explore both optimal and suboptimal reconstructions, include rate heterogeneity through time and more. We believe it will expand the range of novel applications of ancestral sequence reconstruction. [Ancestral sequences; dynamic programming; evolutionary stochastic process; indel; joint ancestral sequence reconstruction; maximum likelihood; Poisson Indel Process; phylogeny; SARS-CoV.].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.