Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35866716›Full record

ArticleCancer2022

Goals of care documentation by medical oncologists and oncology patient end-of-life care outcomes.

Andrew S Epstein, Michael Riley, Judith E Nelson, Camila Bernal, Steven Martin, Han Xiao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07733973 (Evaluating the Effectiveness, Acceptability and Feasibility of a Communication and Care Coordinator), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07733973 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Effectiveness, Acceptability and Feasibility of a Communication and Care Coordinator (CCC) Model in Facilitating Serious Illness Communication (SIC) and Care in Patients With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Centre, SingaporeRan2026 to 2029Enrolled560ConditionsCancerArmsCCC Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Palliative medicine reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of a multidisciplinary goals-of-care program on unplanned readmission rates at a comprehensive cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew S EpsteinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1808-3070
Michael RileyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Judith E NelsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Camila BernalMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0867-1688
Steven MartinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Han XiaoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Communicating with Oncology Nurses about Values from the Outset (CONVO): An Innovative Primary Palliative Care Intervention in English and EspanolR21NR019188 · NINR · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI GANY, FRANCESCA M, NELSON, JUDITH E · 2020 to 2021
$487k
Exploring Measurement of Palliative Care Quality in ICUsR21AG029955 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI NELSON, JUDITH E · 2007 to 2008
$413k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIA NIH HHS R21 AG029955NINR NIH HHS R21 NR019188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGoals of care (GOC) documentation is important but underused. We aimed to improve oncologist GOC documentation and end-of-life (EOL) care.

methodsIn April 2020, our cancer center launched a GOC note template, including optional fields for documenting discussion with the patient about: cancer natural history, goals, and/or EOL (resuscitation preferences, hospice receptivity). Associations between GOC notes and EOL care were evaluated.

resultsAmong 1721 patients dying between June 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021, median days from first GOC note (± with documentation of EOL discussion) to death was 92, whereas a GOC note including EOL discussion ("GOC EOL note"), specifically, was 31. Patients with a first GOC note >60 days before death spent fewer days inpatient (6.7 vs 10.6 days, p < .001). Among patients with GOC EOL notes, those with such documentation >30 days before death had fewer inpatient (5 vs 11, p < .001) and intensive care unit days (0.5 vs 1.5, p < .001), more hospice referrals (57% vs 44%, p = .003), and less chemotherapy ≤14 days before death (6% vs 11%, p = .010). Of 925 admissions of patients dying within ≤30 days, those with GOC EOL notes were shorter (7 vs 9 days, p = .013) but not associated with more hospice discharge (30% vs 25%, p = .163). Oncologist (vs nononcologist) GOC documentation and earlier documentation of EOL discussion were associated in subset analyses with less inpatient care and more hospice referrals.

conclusionsDocumentation of GOC, including EOL discussions, is associated with favorable performance on accepted indicators of quality EOL care.

Indexed as

Hospice CareNeoplasmsOncologistsTerminal CareDocumentationHumansPatient Care Planningadvance care planningcancercommunicationend-of-life caregoals of care

Identifiers

PMID35866716
PMCPMC9420787
OpenAlexW4286716234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.