ArticleCancer2022
Goals of care documentation by medical oncologists and oncology patient end-of-life care outcomes.
Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07733973 (Evaluating the Effectiveness, Acceptability and Feasibility of a Communication and Care Coordinator), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating the Effectiveness, Acceptability and Feasibility of a Communication and Care Coordinator (CCC) Model in Facilitating Serious Illness Communication (SIC) and Care in Patients With Cancer
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing goals of care discussions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician-directed behavioural nudges.Age and ageing · 2026Pooled it
- Acceptability and feasibility of a Patient Support Coordinator (PSC) model to facilitate serious illness communication in outpatient oncology.BMC palliative care · 2026Trial
- Article
- Shared decision-making and deprescribing to support anti-thrombotic therapy (dis)continuance for persons living with cancer in their last phase of life: A realist synthesis.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Using Audit to Improve End-of-Life Care in a Tertiary Cancer Centre.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Navigating goals of care discussion in palliative care: A qualitative study applying Bourdieu's theory of practice.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- The impact of a multidisciplinary goals-of-care program on unplanned readmission rates at a comprehensive cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Differential Impact of a Multicomponent Goals-of-Care Program in Patients with Hematologic and Solid Malignancies.Cancers · 2023Article
- Impact of an Interdisciplinary Goals-of-Care Program Among Medical Inpatients at a Comprehensive Cancer Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Propensity Score Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGoals of care (GOC) documentation is important but underused. We aimed to improve oncologist GOC documentation and end-of-life (EOL) care.
methodsIn April 2020, our cancer center launched a GOC note template, including optional fields for documenting discussion with the patient about: cancer natural history, goals, and/or EOL (resuscitation preferences, hospice receptivity). Associations between GOC notes and EOL care were evaluated.
resultsAmong 1721 patients dying between June 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021, median days from first GOC note (± with documentation of EOL discussion) to death was 92, whereas a GOC note including EOL discussion ("GOC EOL note"), specifically, was 31. Patients with a first GOC note >60 days before death spent fewer days inpatient (6.7 vs 10.6 days, p < .001). Among patients with GOC EOL notes, those with such documentation >30 days before death had fewer inpatient (5 vs 11, p < .001) and intensive care unit days (0.5 vs 1.5, p < .001), more hospice referrals (57% vs 44%, p = .003), and less chemotherapy ≤14 days before death (6% vs 11%, p = .010). Of 925 admissions of patients dying within ≤30 days, those with GOC EOL notes were shorter (7 vs 9 days, p = .013) but not associated with more hospice discharge (30% vs 25%, p = .163). Oncologist (vs nononcologist) GOC documentation and earlier documentation of EOL discussion were associated in subset analyses with less inpatient care and more hospice referrals.
conclusionsDocumentation of GOC, including EOL discussions, is associated with favorable performance on accepted indicators of quality EOL care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.