Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35866377›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2022

Cognitive behavioural therapy (group) for schizophrenia.

Giuseppe Guaiana, Massimiliano Abbatecola, Ghazaleh Aali, Federica Tarantino, Ikenna D Ebuenyi, Valeria Lucarini, Wei Li, Caidi Zhang, Antonio Pinto

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07408934 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07408934 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (the Feeling Safe Programme) for Psychosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Royal Ottawa Mental Health CentreRan2024 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsSchizophrenia and Schizoaffective DisorderArmsCognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis: a systematic review and grade recommendations.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cognitive behavioural therapy (group) for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Giuseppe GuaianaDepartment of Psychiatry and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada.
Massimiliano AbbatecolaCEPICC Napoli, Napoli, Italy.
Ghazaleh AaliInstitute for Health Informatics Research, University College London, London, UK.
Federica TarantinoCEPICC Napoli, Napoli, Italy.
Ikenna D EbuenyiIRIS Centre, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Valeria LucariniInstitute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Wei LiShanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Caidi ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Antonio PintoDMH ASI Napoli 3 sud, SITCC/EABCT, Naples, Italy.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia is a disabling psychotic disorder characterised by positive symptoms of delusions, hallucinations, disorganised speech and behaviour; and negative symptoms such as affective flattening and lack of motivation. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a psychological intervention that aims to change the way in which a person interprets and evaluates their experiences, helping them to identify and link feelings and patterns of thinking that underpin distress. CBT models targeting symptoms of psychosis (CBTp) have been developed for many mental health conditions including schizophrenia. CBTp has been suggested as a useful add-on therapy to medication for people with schizophrenia. While CBT for people with schizophrenia was mainly developed as an individual treatment, it is expensive and a group approach may be more cost-effective. Group CBTp can be defined as a group intervention targeting psychotic symptoms, based on the cognitive behavioural model. In group CBTp, people work collaboratively on coping with distressing hallucinations, analysing evidence for their delusions, and developing problem-solving and social skills. However, the evidence for effectiveness is far from conclusive.

objectivesTo investigate efficacy and acceptability of group CBT applied to psychosis compared with standard care or other psychosocial interventions, for people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. SEARCH

methodsOn 10 February 2021, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases and two trials registries. We handsearched the reference lists of relevant papers and previous systematic reviews and contacted experts in the field for supplemental data. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised controlled trials allocating adults with schizophrenia to receive either group CBT for schizophrenia, compared with standard care, or any other psychosocial intervention (group or individual). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We complied with Cochrane recommended standard of conduct for data screening and collection. Where possible, we calculated risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for binary data and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous data. We used a random-effects model for analyses. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and created a summary of findings table using GRADE. MAIN

resultsThe review includes 24 studies (1900 participants). All studies compared group CBTp with treatments that a person with schizophrenia would normally receive in a standard mental health service (standard care) or any other psychosocial intervention (group or individual). None of the studies compared group CBTp with individual CBTp. Overall risk of bias within the trials was moderate to low. We found no studies reporting data for our primary outcome of clinically important change. With regard to numbers of participants leaving the study early, group CBTp has little or no effect compared to standard care or other psychosocial interventions (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.59; studies = 13, participants = 1267; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsGroup CBTp appears to be no better or worse than standard care or other psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia in terms of leaving the study early, service use and general quality of life. Group CBTp seems to be more effective than standard care or other psychosocial interventions on overall mental state and global functioning scores. These results may not be widely applicable as each study had a low sample size. Therefore, no firm conclusions concerning the efficacy of group CBTp for people with schizophrenia can currently be made. More high-quality research, reporting useable and relevant data is needed.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaAdultHallucinationsHumansQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID35866377
PMCPMC9308944
OpenAlexW4286764479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.