Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35866205›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2022

A scoping review of COVID-19 online mis/disinformation in Black communities.

Janet Kemei, Dominic A Alaazi, Mia Tulli, Megan Kennedy, Modupe Tunde-Byass, Paul Bailey, Ato Sekyi-Otu, Sharon Murdoch, Habiba Mohamud, Jeanne Lehman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates and Vaccine Hesitancy among Black People in Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Janet KemeiUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Dominic A AlaaziUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Mia TulliUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Megan KennedyUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Modupe Tunde-ByassBlack Physicians of Ontario, University of Ontario, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul BaileyBlack Health Alliance, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ato Sekyi-OtuBlack Opportunity Fund, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon MurdochHealth Association of African Canadians, Cherry Brook, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Habiba MohamudIMPACT Institute of Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jeanne LehmanBlack Canadian Women in Action, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Bukola SalamiUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CACanadian Public Health Association · CADigital Research Alliance of CanadaImpact · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mis/disinformation has reached an epidemic level with the COVID-19 virus and can be largely attributed to the growing digitalization of information and its rapid transmission via social media. Approximately 96% of Canadians and 80% of Americans report encountering COVID-19 dis/misinformation on at least one social media site/app. COVID-19 dis/misinformation promotes scepticism and a lack of confidence in COVID-19 interventions. Black people have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of negative impacts on their livelihoods and are also more likely to be hesitant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Dis/misinformation contributes to high rates of COVID-19 infection and low uptake of COVID-19 vaccination. Hence, the purpose of this scoping review was to map out the nature and extent of current research on COVID-19 disinformation among Blacks in Africa and the African diaspora. Methods: We searched and reviewed articles from major databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Our search strategy involved the following concepts: 1) COVID-19, including variants; 2) misinformation, conspiracy theories, and fake news, and modes of misinformation transmission such as social media; and 3) Blacks or people of African descent, or the African diaspora. We retrieved 600 articles that were independently screened by two researchers. We included studies focusing on 1) Black people living inside or outside Africa; and 2) COVID-19 online dis/misinformation among this population. A total of 19 studies fit our inclusion criteria. We used a thematic analysis to analyse qualitative data. Results: Our findings indicate Black people are accessing and often sharing online disinformation and misinformation primarily through social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Dis/misinformation concerns the origin of COVID-19, transmission, prevention, and treatment of COVID-19, assertions of race immunity to the virus, distrust in government and health organizations, and intervention research and programming. Conclusions: There is a global paucity of literature addressing COVID-19 online dis/misinformation among Black people. Dis/misinformation can fuel vaccine hesitancy and threaten the goal of herd immunity. Knowledge of the impact and implications of COVID-19 online dis/misinformation is necessary to inform public health interventions in Black communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19CanadaCommunicationCOVID-19 VaccinesDisinformationHumansPandemicsUnited StatesCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35866205
PMCPMC9304926
OpenAlexW4286696914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.