Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35866200›Full record

Trial reportHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

The development of a culturally sensitive educational video: How to facilitate informed decisions on cervical cancer screening among Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch women.

Nora Hamdiui, Martine P A Bouman, Mart L Stein, Rik Crutzen, Damla Keskin, Amina Afrian, Jim E van Steenbergen, Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh, Aura Timen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nora HamdiuiNational Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2861-7072
Martine P A BoumanCenter for Media & Health, Gouda, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4961-7250
Mart L SteinNational Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0502-7993
Rik CrutzenDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3731-6610
Damla KeskinNational Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Amina AfrianNational Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Jim E van SteenbergenNational Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3652-5146
Maria E T C van den MuijsenberghDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-4008
Aura TimenNational Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5793-5443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Netherlands, all women aged 30-60 years are invited to participate in the national cervical cancer screening programme, which is aimed at early detection and treatment of precancerous lesions. One fourth of the Dutch population has a migration background, with Turkish and Moroccan immigrants being the largest immigrant populations. Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch women show lower screening participation rates and a higher incidence of cervical cancer, compared to native Dutch women. Since current information materials are not tailored to these women's needs, we developed a short culturally sensitive educational video to facilitate informed decision-making for cervical cancer screening among Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch women. This article describes the development process of this video and the lessons learned.

methodsUsing the Entertainment-Education communication strategy, we collaborated with an interdisciplinary team of Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch women, researchers, public health experts, and creative media professionals. We developed the video following the different stages of the Media Mapping model: Orientation, Crystallization, Design/Production, Implementation, and Dissemination. Each stage is described in the paper.

resultsThe video was developed in Moroccan-Arabic, -Berber and Turkish, and emphasized three main themes: (1) more certainty about having cervical (pre)cancer and the possibility to prevent treatment, surgery, or premature death, and because of this, being there for the children, (2) according to the Islam, a woman should take good care of her health, and (3) anxiety, shame, and privacy.

conclusionsA short culturally sensitive educational video, delivered as part of a larger intervention together with the current information brochure, was developed based on theory and grounded in the needs of Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch women. The value and effectiveness of this intervention to facilitate informed cervical cancer screening decisions are evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: We collaborated with Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch women during the development process of a short culturally sensitive educational video. Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch women were also invited to watch the raw footage to verify whether the content and presentation matched their needs and requirements.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsChildEarly Detection of CancerEducational StatusEthnicityFemaleHumansNetherlandscervical cancer screeningentertainment-educationintervention developmentThe NetherlandsTurkish- and Moroccan-Dutch womenvideo production

Identifiers

PMID35866200
PMCPMC9615061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.