Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35866100›Full record

ArticleJournal of geophysical research. Solid earth2021

Micromagnetic Tomography for Paleomagnetism and Rock-Magnetism.

Lennart V de Groot, Karl Fabian, Annemarieke Béguin, Martha E Kosters, David Cortés-Ortuño, Roger R Fu, Chloë M L Jansen, Richard J Harrison, Tristan van Leeuwen, Auke Barnhoorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Micromagnetic Tomography for Paleomagnetism and Rock-Magnetism.Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lennart V de GrootPaleomagnetic laboratory Fort Hoofddijk Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1151-5662
Karl FabianDepartment of Geoscience and Petroleum Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3504-3292
Annemarieke BéguinPaleomagnetic laboratory Fort Hoofddijk Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-4247
Martha E KostersPaleomagnetic laboratory Fort Hoofddijk Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5035-1034
David Cortés-OrtuñoPaleomagnetic laboratory Fort Hoofddijk Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3799-3141
Roger R FuDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-2676
Chloë M L JansenPaleomagnetic laboratory Fort Hoofddijk Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.
Richard J HarrisonDepartment of Earth Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3469-762X
Tristan van LeeuwenMathematical Institute Faculty of Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-6426
Auke BarnhoornDepartment of Geoscience and Engineering Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3074-5535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the past behavior of the geomagnetic field arises from magnetic signals stored in geological materials, e.g., (volcanic) rocks. Bulk rock samples, however, often contain magnetic grains that differ in chemistry, size, and shape; some of them record the Earth's magnetic field well, others are unreliable. The presence of a small amount of adverse behaved magnetic grains in a sample may already obscure important information on the past state of the geomagnetic field. Recently it was shown that it is possible to determine magnetizations of individual grains in a sample by combining X-ray computed tomography and magnetic surface scanning measurements. Here we establish this new Micromagnetic Tomography (MMT) technique and make it suitable for use with different magnetic scanning techniques, and for both synthetic and natural samples. We acquired reliable magnetic directions by selecting subsets of grains in a synthetic sample, and we obtained rock-magnetic information of individual grains in a volcanic sample. This illustrates that MMT opens up entirely new venues of paleomagnetic and rock-magnetic research. MMT's unique ability to determine the magnetization of individual grains in a nondestructive way allows for a systematic analysis of how geological materials record and retain information on the past state of the Earth's magnetic field. Moreover, by interpreting only the contributions of known magnetically well-behaved grains in a sample, MMT has the potential to unlock paleomagnetic information from even the most complex, crucial, or valuable recorders that current methods are unable to recover.

Indexed as

microCTmicromagnetic tomographyrock‐magnetismscanning magnetometry

Identifiers

PMID35866100
PMCPMC9286618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.