Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35866053›Full record

ArticleFood and energy security2022

Banana seed genetic resources for food security: Status, constraints, and future priorities.

Simon Kallow, Arne Mertens, Steven B Janssens, Filip Vandelook, John Dickie, Rony Swennen, Bart Panis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food and energy security, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Strategies for the Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Banana breeding by genome design.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Drying banana seeds forConservation physiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Phylogeography and conservation gaps ofGenetic resources and crop evolution · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon KallowRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew Millennium Seed Bank Ardingly UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0869-5797
Arne MertensDepartment of Biosystems Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3272-9464
Steven B JanssensMeise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1246-9474
Filip VandelookMeise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-5557
John DickieRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew Millennium Seed Bank Ardingly UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-8113
Rony SwennenDepartment of Biosystems Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-9043
Bart PanisDepartment of Biosystems Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6717-947X
Meise Botanic Garden · BEInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture · UGKU Leuven · BERoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Storing seed collections of crop wild relatives, wild plant taxa genetically related to crops, is an essential component in global food security. Seed banking protects genetic resources from degradation and extinction and provides material for use by breeders. Despite being among the most important crops in the world, banana and plantain crop wild relatives are largely under-represented in genebanks. Nevertheless, banana crop wild relative seed collections are in fact held in different countries, but these have not previously been part of reporting or analysis. To fill this gap, we firstly collated banana seed accession data from 13 institutions in 10 countries. These included 537 accessions containing an estimated 430,000 seeds of 56 species. We reviewed their taxonomic coverage and seed storage conditions including viability estimates. We found that seed accessions have low viability (25% mean) representing problems in seed storage and processing. Secondly, we surveyed 22 institutions involved in banana genetic resource conservation regarding the key constraints and knowledge gaps that institutions face related to banana seed conservation. Major constraints were identified including finding suitable material and populations to collect seeds from, lack of knowledge regarding optimal storage conditions and germination conditions. Thirdly, we carried out a conservation prioritization and gap analysis of Musaceae taxa, using established methods, to index representativeness. Overall, our conservation assessment showed that despite this extended data set banana crop wild relatives are inadequately conserved, with 51% of taxa not represented in seed collections at all; the average conservation assessment showing high priority for conservation according to the index. Finally, we provide recommendations for future collecting, research, and management, to conserve banana and plantain crop wild relatives in seed banks for future generations.

Indexed as

bananascrop wild relativesex situ conservationplant genetic resourcesseed banking

Identifiers

PMID35866053
PMCPMC9285888
OpenAlexW3213194548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.