ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2022
Knowledge and perception of cardiovascular disease risk in women of reproductive age.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Is My Risk? A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Risk Perception for Cardiometabolic Pregnancy Complications and Future Cardiometabolic Disease Development.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025Pooled it
- Discordance Between Perceived Risk and Cardiovascular Health in Women of Reproductive Age.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Stable angina in young women.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Association of Hypertension With Health Care Access and Utilization Following Childbirth: Differences by Race and Ethnicity.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Perceived Risk Perception of Future Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in the Postpartum Period.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Maternal knowledge about long-term consequences of pregnancy complications - a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- PCSK9-Targeting Drugs and Gender: Are There Any Differences?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Vitamin E TPGS-Based Organic Nanocarriers for Enhancing the Oral Bioavailability of Active Compounds: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Incorporating Cardiovascular Risk Assessment into Adolescent Reproductive Health and Primary Care Visits.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2024Article
- Review
- Women's Knowledge of Future Cardiovascular Risk Associated With Complications of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.CJC open · 2024Review
- Knowledge and care regarding long-term cardiovascular risk after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2024Article
- Risk Perception for Developing Cardiometabolic Disease Among Women Diagnosed with Preeclampsia and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Reproductive Experiences and Cardiovascular Disease Care in Pregnancy-Capable and Postmenopausal Individuals: Insights From the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry.Current problems in cardiology · 2023Review
- Perceived Cardiovascular Disease Risk Following Preeclampsia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Perceptions of women enrolled in a cardiovascular disease screening and prevention in HIV study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023Article
- Knowledge, Health Education, and Mobile Health Strategies on Cardiovascular Disease Awareness in Women: A Narrative Review.Journal of mid-life healthReview
- Lifestyle Interventions to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Mothers with Young Children: A Scoping Review.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Women who experience adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, their knowledge of CVD risk is not well characterized. We aimed to evaluate knowledge and perception of CVD risk in young women and to determine whether these factors differ based on experience of an APO. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among women with a recent live birth at an urban medical center. Knowledge and perception of CVD risk were assessed through a self-administered online survey adapted from the American Heart Association Survey of Women's CVD Awareness. Results: Of 5612 individuals contacted between 3/1/21 and 4/18/21, 714 completed the survey; the mean (SD) age was 34 (4) years and 25% reported an APO. While 62% of respondents identified CVD as the leading cause of death in women, there was no significant difference in CVD knowledge scores between participants who reported experiencing an APO and those who did not (6.9 vs 6.8 out of 10; Conclusions: Gaps remain in knowledge of CVD risk among young women, particularly after an APO. The peripartum period may represent a unique opportunity for targeted education when healthcare engagement is high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.