Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35865791›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2022

Design Principles for the Development of Gd(III) Polarizing Agents for Magic Angle Spinning Dynamic Nuclear Polarization.

Yu Rao, Chad T Palumbo, Amrit Venkatesh, Megan Keener, Gabriele Stevanato, Anne-Sophie Chauvin, Georges Menzildjian, Sergei Kuzin, Maxim Yulikov, Gunnar Jeschke and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optical Hyperpolarization of 1H and 19F Spins in Organic Liquids.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Off-the-Shelf Gd(NOThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yu RaoLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-5596
Chad T PalumboGroup of Coordination Chemistry, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Amrit VenkateshLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5319-9269
Megan KeenerGroup of Coordination Chemistry, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gabriele StevanatoLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-1286
Anne-Sophie ChauvinGroup of Coordination Chemistry, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-3866
Georges MenzildjianLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6285-0447
Sergei KuzinLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Maxim YulikovLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3275-0714
Gunnar JeschkeLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6853-8585
Anne LesageCentre de RMN à Très Hauts Champs, Université de Lyon (CNRS/ENS Lyon/UCB Lyon 1), 69100 Villeurbanne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1958-2840
Marinella MazzantiGroup of Coordination Chemistry, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3427-008X
Lyndon EmsleyLaboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1360-2572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance suffers from an intrinsically low sensitivity, which can be overcome by dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP). Gd(III) complexes are attractive exogenous polarizing agents for magic angle spinning (MAS) DNP due to their high chemical stability in contrast to nitroxide-based radicals. However, even the state-of-the-art Gd(III) complexes have so far provided relatively low DNP signal enhancements of ca. 36 in comparison to standard DNP biradicals, which show enhancements of over 200. Here, we report a series of new Gd(III) complexes for DNP and show that the observed DNP enhancements of the new and existing Gd(III) complexes are inversely proportional to the square of the zero-field splitting (ZFS) parameter

Identifiers

PMID35865791
PMCPMC9289950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.