Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35865752›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2022

The RAIS Device for Global Surgery: Using a Participatory Design Approach to Navigate the Translational Pathway to Clinical Use.

M Marriott Webb, P Bridges, N Aruparayil, C Chugh, T Beacon, T Singh, S S Sawhney, L Bains, R Hall, D Jayne and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Green Surgery: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

M Marriott WebbSchool of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K.
P BridgesPd-m International Thirsk YO7 1DA U.K.
N AruparayilLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K.
C ChughDepartment of SurgeryMaulana Azad Medical College New Delhi 110002 India.
T BeaconMedical Aid International Bedford MK43 8TW U.K.
T SinghXLO Ortho Life Systems New Delhi 110020 India.
S S SawhneyXLO Ortho Life Systems New Delhi 110020 India.
L BainsDepartment of SurgeryMaulana Azad Medical College New Delhi 110002 India.ORCID 0000-0002-8627-0452
R HallPd-m International Thirsk YO7 1DA U.K.
D JayneDepartment of Academic SurgeryUniversity of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-8725-3283
J GnanarajDepartment of Electronics and Instrumentation EngineeringKarunya University Coimbatore 641114 India.
A MishraDepartment of SurgeryMaulana Azad Medical College New Delhi 110002 India.
P R CulmerSchool of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-2867-0420
University of Leeds · GBMaulana Azad Medical College · INThird Way · USKarunya University · INMedical Care Development International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 5 billion people worldwide have no access to surgery worldwide, typically in low-resource settings, despite it being a primary life-saving treatment. Gas Insufflation-Less Laparoscopic Surgery (GILLS) can address this inequity, by improving current GILLS instrumentation to modern surgical standards.

objectiveto develop and translate a new Retractor for Abdominal Insufflation-less Surgery (RAIS) into clinical use and thus provide a context-appropriate system to advance GILLS surgery.

methodsA collaborative multidisciplinary team from the UK and India was formed, embedding local clinical stakeholders and an industry partner in defining user and contextual needs. System development was based on a phased roadmap for 'surgical device design in low resource settings' and embedded participatory and frugal design principles in an iterative process supported by traditional medical device design methodologies. Each phase of development was evaluated by the stakeholder team through interactive workshops using cadaveric surgical simulations. A Commercialisation phase undertook Design to Manufacture and regulatory approval activities. Clinical validation was then conducted with rural surgeons performing GILLS procedures using the RAIS system. Semi-structured questionnaires and interviews were used to evaluate device performance.

resultsA set of user needs and contextual requirements were defined and formalised. System development occurred across five iterations. Stakeholder participation was instrumental in converging on a design which met user requirements. A commercial RAIS system was then produced by an industry partner under Indian regulatory approval. This was successfully used in clinical validation to conduct 12 surgical procedures at two locations in rural India. Surgical feedback showed that the RAIS system provided a valuable and usable surgical instrument which was appropriate for use in low-resource contexts.

conclusionsUsing a context-specific development approach with close engagement of stakeholders was crucial to develop the RAIS system for low-resource regions. The outcome is translation from global health need into a fully realized commercial instrument which can be used by surgeons in low-resource regions across India.

Indexed as

InsufflationSurgeonsFeedbackHumansStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and Questionnairesfrugal engineeringglobal healthmedical device designparticipatory designsurgical technology

Identifiers

PMID35865752
PMCPMC9292337
OpenAlexW4285146229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.