Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35865673›Full record

ArticleFood and energy security2022

Variation in mycorrhizal growth response among a spring wheat mapping population shows potential to breed for symbiotic benefit.

Tom J Thirkell, Mike Grimmer, Lucy James, Daria Pastok, Théa Allary, Ashleigh Elliott, Neil Paveley, Tim Daniell, Katie J Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food and energy security, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tom J ThirkellPlants, Photosynthesis and Soil School of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Mike GrimmerADAS Boxworth Cambridge UK.
Lucy JamesADAS Boxworth Cambridge UK.
Daria PastokSchool of Biology Centre for Plant Sciences University of Leeds Leeds UK.
Théa AllaryPlants, Photosynthesis and Soil School of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Ashleigh ElliottSchool of Biology Centre for Plant Sciences University of Leeds Leeds UK.
Neil PaveleyADAS High Mowthorpe Duggleby UK.
Tim DaniellPlants, Photosynthesis and Soil School of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Katie J FieldPlants, Photosynthesis and Soil School of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All cereal crops engage in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses which can have profound, but sometimes deleterious, effects on plant nutrient acquisition and growth. The mechanisms underlying variable mycorrhizal responsiveness in cereals are not well characterised or understood. Adapting crops to realise mycorrhizal benefits could reduce fertiliser requirements and improve crop nutrition where fertiliser is unavailable. We conducted a phenotype screen in wheat (

Indexed as

arbuscular mycorrhizafungimycorrhizal growth responsephosphorussustainable agricultureTriticum aestivum (wheat)

Identifiers

PMID35865673
PMCPMC9286679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.