ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Acute Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation: Risk of Incorrect NOAC Dosage When Estimating Renal Function From Plasma Creatinine Only.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors and Outcomes of Inappropriate Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients Receiving Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Cardiology and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardioembolic stroke (CS) due to atrial fibrillation (AF) bears a high risk of unfavorable outcome. Treatment with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) reduces this risk. NOAC dosage occurs on a thin line during the acute phase of the stroke unit when the patient is threatened by both recurrent CS and a hemorrhagic stroke. It is often adapted to renal function-usually glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-to prevent both under- and overdosing. This study investigates the hypothetical risk of incorrect NOAC dosage after acute stroke when relying on plasma creatinine alone in comparison to a more exact renal function assessment including urine collection. Methods: In a cohort study on consecutive 481 patients treated in a stroke unit with acute stroke and AF, the GFR estimated from plasma creatinine (eGFR) was compared to concurrent creatinine clearance measurement (CrCl) from urine collection regarding the hypothetically derived NOAC dosage. Results: The risk of incorrect dosage (mean, 95% confidence interval) was 6.9% (4.8-9.5), 26% (23-31), 38% (33-42), and 20% (16-23) for apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, respectively. The overall risk for incorrect dosage of any NOAC was 23% (21-25). Thresholds for age and admission eGFR were optimized to achieve an overall risk below 5% by additional CrCl measurements in selected patients (apixaban <36 ml/min and any age, dabigatran <75 ml/min and >70 y, edoxaban >36 ml/min and >58 y, rivaroxaban <76 ml/min and >75 y, any NOAC <81 ml/min and >54 y). The resulting portion of patients requiring an additional CrCl measurement was 10, 60, 80, 55, and 65% for apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and any NOAC, respectively. Conclusions: There is a considerable risk of incorrect NOAC dosage in patients with acute CS treated in a stroke unit that can be lowered by targeted CrCl measurements in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.