Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35865552›Full record

ArticleCase reports in dentistry2022

Class III Orthodontic Camouflage: Is the "Ideal" Treatment Always the Best Option? A Documented Case Report.

Lorenzo Rustico, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Flavia Iaculli, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Gaetano Isola, Antonino Lo Giudice

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenzo RusticoDepartment of Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario "G. Rodolico", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8529-7947
Vincenzo RonsivalleDepartment of Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario "G. Rodolico", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-4981
Flavia IaculliDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-532X
Gianrico SpagnuoloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-9786
Gaetano IsolaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario "G. Rodolico", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-6992
Antonino Lo GiudiceDepartment of Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario "G. Rodolico", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6086-2348
University of Catania · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angle's Class III is one of the most complex malocclusions to treat. In nongrowing skeletal class III malocclusions, the choice between orthognathic surgery and camouflage treatment remains a challenge to the orthodontist. In class III borderline cases, clinicians are called to find the best compromise between functional and aesthetics outcomes, with the latter which often turns in avoiding worsening of profile characteristics, which makes the treatment of these patients quite challenging. This case report describes a borderline nongrowing patient with skeletal class III malocclusion, upper incisor proclination and spacing, lower crowding, and arch width discrepancy, which has already undergone previous orthodontic treatment. The orthodontic treatment involved the mandibular first premolar extraction, resulting in class I canine relation with good overjet and overbite as well as good arch coordination. The orthodontic camouflage improved the dental relationship with normalization of upper incisor inclination without a relevant retroclination of lower incisors; the skeletal facial pattern of the patient experienced a slight improvement. The tendency to skeletal class III has remained nearly unaffected. Treatment outcomes were stable after 1-year posttreatment follow-up.

Identifiers

PMID35865552
PMCPMC9296280
OpenAlexW4285089188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.