Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35865467›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Evaluation of the Efficiency of MRI-Based Radiomics Classifiers in the Diagnosis of Prostate Lesions.

Linghao Li, Lili Gu, Bin Kang, Jiaojiao Yang, Ying Wu, Hao Liu, Shasha Lai, Xueting Wu, Jian Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Linghao LiDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Lili GuDepartment of Pain, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Bin KangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jiaojiao YangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Ying WuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Hao LiuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Shasha LaiDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xueting WuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jian JiangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the performance of different imaging classifiers in the prospective diagnosis of prostate diseases based on multiparameter MRI. Methods: A total of 238 patients with pathological outcomes were enrolled from September 2019 to July 2021, including 142 in the training set and 96 in the test set. After the regions of interest were manually segmented, decision tree (DT), Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB), XGBoost, logistic regression, random forest (RF) and support vector machine classifier (SVC) models were established on the training set and tested on the independent test set. The prospective diagnostic performance of each classifier was compared by using the AUC, F1-score and Brier score. Results: In the patient-based data set, the top three classifiers of combined sequences in terms of the AUC were logistic regression (0.865), RF (0.862), and DT (0.852); RF "was significantly different from the other two classifiers (P =0.022, P =0.005), while logistic regression and DT had no statistical significance (P =0.802). In the lesions-based data set, the top three classifiers of combined sequences in terms of the AUC were RF (0.931), logistic regression (0.922) and GNB (0.922). These three classifiers were significantly different from. Conclusion: The results of this experiment show that radiomics has a high diagnostic efficiency for prostate lesions. The RF classifier generally performed better overall than the other classifiers in the experiment. The XGBoost and logistic regression models also had high classification value in the lesions-based data set.

Indexed as

MRIprostate cancerradiomicRFSVC

Identifiers

PMID35865467
PMCPMC9295912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.