SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Time-Dependent Effect of Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy on Central Arterial Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Charting the Current Landscape and Future Prospects of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiovascular Toxicity in Cancer Survivors: From Bench to Bedside.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Long-term cardiovascular consequences of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction: insights from ventricular-arterial coupling and myocardial work.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Dexrazoxane prevents vascular toxicity in doxorubicin-treated mice.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Doxorubicin-induced cardiovascular toxicity: a longitudinal evaluation of functional and molecular markers.Cardiovascular research · 2023Article
- Dexrazoxane does not mitigate early vascular toxicity induced by doxorubicin in mice.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Anthracycline-based chemotherapy (ANTH-BC) has been proposed to increase arterial stiffness, however, the time-dependency of these effects remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the time-dependent effect of ANTH-BC on markers of central aortic stiffness, namely aortic distensibility (AD) and pulse-wave-velocity (PWV) in cancer patients. Methods: An extensive literature search without language restrictions was performed to identify all studies presenting longitudinal data on the effect of ANTH-BC on either AD and/or central PWV in cancer patients of all ages. An inverse-variance weighted random-effect model was performed with differences from before to after chemotherapy, as well as for short vs. mid-term effects. Results: Of 2,130 articles identified, 9 observational studies with a total of 535 patients (mean age 52 ± 11; 73% women) were included, of which four studies measured AD and seven PWV. Short-term (2-4 months), there was a clinically meaningful increase in arterial stiffness, namely an increase in PWV of 2.05 m/s (95% CI 0.68-3.43) and a decrease in AD (albeit non-significant) of -1.49 mmHg-1 (-3.25 to 0.27) but a smaller effect was observed mid-term (6-12 months) for PWV of 0.88 m/s (-0.25 to 2.02) and AD of -0.37 mmHg-1 (-1.13 to 0.39). There was considerable heterogeneity among the studies. Conclusions: Results from this analysis suggest that in the short-term, ANTH-BC increases arterial stiffness, but that these changes may partly be reversible after therapy termination. Future studies need to elucidate the long-term consequences of ANTH-BC on arterial stiffness, by performing repeated follow-up measurements after ANTH-BC termination. Systematic Review Registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42019141837].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.