Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35865329›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2022

Developing Intelligent Robots that Grasp Affordance.

Gerald E Loeb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gerald E LoebDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and robots operating in unstructured environments both need to classify objects through haptic exploration and use them in various tasks, but currently they differ greatly in their strategies for acquiring such capabilities. This review explores nascent technologies that promise more convergence. A novel form of artificial intelligence classifies objects according to sensory percepts during active exploration and decides on efficient sequences of exploratory actions to identify objects. Representing objects according to the collective experience of manipulating them provides a substrate for discovering causality and affordances. Such concepts that generalize beyond explicit training experiences are an important aspect of human intelligence that has eluded robots. For robots to acquire such knowledge, they will need an extended period of active exploration and manipulation similar to that employed by infants. The efficacy, efficiency and safety of such behaviors depends on achieving smooth transitions between movements that change quickly from exploratory to executive to reflexive. Animals achieve such smoothness by using a hierarchical control scheme that is fundamentally different from those of conventional robotics. The lowest level of that hierarchy, the spinal cord, starts to self-organize during spontaneous movements in the fetus. This allows its connectivity to reflect the mechanics of the musculoskeletal plant, a bio-inspired process that could be used to adapt spinal-like middleware for robots. Implementation of these extended and essential stages of fetal and infant development is impractical, however, for mechatronic hardware that does not heal and replace itself like biological tissues. Instead such development can now be accomplished

Indexed as

dexterityexplorationhapticslearningmanipulationreflexes

Identifiers

PMID35865329
PMCPMC9294137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.