ArticleResuscitation plus2022
Neighborhood-level out-of-hospital cardiac arrest risk and the impact of local CPR interventions.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying High-Risk Cardiac Arrest Neighborhoods Using Social Vulnerability Index and Geospatial Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Ventilation Rates and Capnography in Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Advanced Airways.Prehospital emergency care · 2025Article
- Factors influencing support for the implementation of community-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest interventions in high- and low-performing counties.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Facilitating cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in high-risk areas of England: A study protocol.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It is unclear how best to identify "high-risk" areas for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and if neighborhood-level interventions improve bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR). Our objectives were to 1) identify and compare community characteristics between high and low-risk neighborhoods; and 2) examine change in BCPR after a targeted hands-only CPR intervention. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of OHCA events in Franklin County, Ohio between 1/1/2010-12/31/2017. Adult (≥18 years) OHCAs in a non-healthcare setting with emergency medical services resuscitation attempted were included. High-risk neighborhoods based on OHCA incidence and BCPR rates were identified using global Empirical Bayes, Local Moran's I, and spatial scan statistic. We compared characteristics of high and low-risk neighborhoods and examined change in BCPR. Results: From the 3,841 included OHCAs, the mean adjusted OHCA incidence per census tract was 0.81 per 1,000, BCPR rate was 37.2%, and survival to hospital discharge was 11.5%. Of the 35 census tracts identified as high-risk, ten persisted from previous work. OHCA incidence was higher in high-risk neighborhoods (1.30 per 1,000 vs. 0.73, p < 0.001) and BCPR rates were lower (30.2% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.001). There were significant differences in characteristics between high and low-risk neighborhoods (e.g., Black population: 45.3% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.001). The neighborhoods targeted for the community education intervention had similar pre- and post-intervention BCPR rates. Conclusions: Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics differed between high- and low-risk neighborhoods. BCPR rates were lower in high-risk neighborhoods despite a targeted BCPR intervention. Educational interventions may be necessary, but not sufficient, to improve OHCA outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.