Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35865171›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2022

Episiotomy Practice and Its Associated Factors in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Beshada Zerfu Woldegeorgis, Mohammed Suleiman Obsa, Lemi Belay Tolu, Efa Ambaw Bogino, Tesfalem Israel Boda, Henok Berhanu Alemu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07383623 (THE EFFECT OF STAPLER VERSUS SKIN SUTURING ON PAIN AND WOUND HEALING AFTER EPISIOTOMY REPAIR IN PRIMIPAROUS WOMEN), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07383623 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The effect of stapler versus skin suturing on pain and wound healing after episiotomy repair in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAyşegül KanıkRan2025 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsEpisiotomyArmsstapler skin closure, absorbable suture group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Frequency of episiotomy practice in an institution in Quito, Ecuador 2009-2022].Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beshada Zerfu WoldegeorgisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia.
Mohammed Suleiman ObsaDepartment of Anesthesia, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia.
Lemi Belay ToluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Efa Ambaw BoginoDermatovenereology Department, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia.
Tesfalem Israel BodaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia.
Henok Berhanu AlemuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Episiotomy, a surgical procedure that enlarges the vaginal opening during childbirth, was common practice until the early 2000s. Other sources, including the World Health Organization (WHO), advocate for the selective use of episiotomy. Episiotomy rates, on the other hand, have remained high in developing countries, while declining in developed countries. As a result, the current study sought to determine the overall prevalence of episiotomy in Africa as well as the risk factors associated with its practice. Methods: Articles were searched in international electronic databases. A standardized Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and STATA software version 14 were used for data extraction and analysis, respectively. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist was used to write this report. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to determine the pooled prevalence of episiotomy. A heterogeneity test was conducted using I-Squared ( Result: A total of 21 studies with 40,831 participants were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of episiotomy practice was 41.7% [95% CI (36.0-47.4), Conclusion: In this review, the prevalence of episiotomy among African parturients was high. A selective episiotomy practice should be implemented to reduce the high episiotomy rates. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021293382, identifier: CRD42021293382.

Indexed as

Africaassociated factorsdeliveryepisiotomyparturientperineum

Identifiers

PMID35865171
PMCPMC9295659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.