Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35864994›Full record

ArticleEcological monographs2022

Remotely detected aboveground plant function predicts belowground processes in two prairie diversity experiments.

Jeannine Cavender-Bares, Anna K Schweiger, John A Gamon, Hamed Gholizadeh, Kimberly Helzer, Cathleen Lapadat, Michael D Madritch, Philip A Townsend, Zhihui Wang, Sarah E Hobbie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological monographs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeannine Cavender-BaresDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota Saint Paul Minnesota 55108 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3375-9630
Anna K SchweigerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota Saint Paul Minnesota 55108 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5567-4200
John A GamonSchool of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska 68583 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8269-7723
Hamed GholizadehSchool of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska 68583 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-7893
Kimberly HelzerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota Saint Paul Minnesota 55108 USA.
Cathleen LapadatDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota Saint Paul Minnesota 55108 USA.
Michael D MadritchDepartment of Biology Appalachian State University Boone North Carolina 28608 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-3135
Philip A TownsendDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-8774
Zhihui WangDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1064-7820
Sarah E HobbieDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota Saint Paul Minnesota 55108 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5159-031X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging spectroscopy provides the opportunity to incorporate leaf and canopy optical data into ecological studies, but the extent to which remote sensing of vegetation can enhance the study of belowground processes is not well understood. In terrestrial systems, aboveground and belowground vegetation quantity and quality are coupled, and both influence belowground microbial processes and nutrient cycling. We hypothesized that ecosystem productivity, and the chemical, structural and phylogenetic-functional composition of plant communities would be detectable with remote sensing and could be used to predict belowground plant and soil processes in two grassland biodiversity experiments: the BioDIV experiment at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve in Minnesota and the Wood River Nature Conservancy experiment in Nebraska. We tested whether aboveground vegetation chemistry and productivity, as detected from airborne sensors, predict soil properties, microbial processes and community composition. Imaging spectroscopy data were used to map aboveground biomass, green vegetation cover, functional traits and phylogenetic-functional community composition of vegetation. We examined the relationships between the image-derived variables and soil carbon and nitrogen concentration, microbial community composition, biomass and extracellular enzyme activity, and soil processes, including net nitrogen mineralization. In the BioDIV experiment-which has low overall diversity and productivity despite high variation in each-belowground processes were driven mainly by variation in the amount of organic matter inputs to soils. As a consequence, soil respiration, microbial biomass and enzyme activity, and fungal and bacterial composition and diversity were significantly predicted by remotely sensed vegetation cover and biomass. In contrast, at Wood River-where plant diversity and productivity were consistently higher-belowground processes were driven mainly by variation in the quality of aboveground inputs to soils. Consequently, remotely sensed functional, chemical and phylogenetic composition of vegetation predicted belowground extracellular enzyme activity, microbial biomass, and net nitrogen mineralization rates but aboveground biomass (or cover) did not. The contrasting associations between the quantity (productivity) and quality (composition) of aboveground inputs with belowground soil attributes provide a basis for using imaging spectroscopy to understand belowground processes across productivity gradients in grassland systems. However, a mechanistic understanding of how above and belowground components interact among different ecosystems remains critical to extending these results broadly.

Indexed as

biodiversityecosystem processeshyperspectral dataimaging spectroscopymicrobial biomassphylogenetic‐functional groupsplant traitsproductivityremote sensingsoil enzyme activitysoil processesvegetation chemistry

Identifiers

PMID35864994
PMCPMC9285928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.