Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35864350›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2023

Value of

Mohsen Beheshti, Pekka Taimen, Jukka Kemppainen, Ivan Jambor, Andre Müller, Wolfgang Loidl, Esa Kähkönen, Meeri Käkelä, Mathias Berndt, Andrew W Stephens and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Prospective head-to-head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. RM2 and DB15 analogues bearing [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohsen BeheshtiDivision of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine & Endocrinology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, A-5020, Salzburg, Austria. m.beheshti@salk.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3918-3812
Pekka TaimenInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Finland and Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jukka KemppainenTurku PET Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Ivan JamborDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Andre MüllerLife Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang LoidlDepartment of Urology, Ordensklinikum, Linz, Austria.
Esa KähkönenDepartment of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Meeri KäkeläTurku PET Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Mathias BerndtLife Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Andrew W StephensLife Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Heikki MinnInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Clinical Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Werner LangstegerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Endocrinology, PET-CT Center LINZ, St. Vincent's Hospital, Linz, Austria.
University of Turku · FITurku University Hospital · FIKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATParacelsus Medical University · ATWomen's General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe bombesin derivative RM2 is a GRPr antagonist with strong binding affinity to prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, the impact of [

methodsThis phase I/II study was conducted in 30 biopsy-positive PCa subjects. The patients were stratified into high (10 patients), intermediate (10 patients), and low risk (10 patients) for extraglandular metastases as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria (NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2016). The prostate gland was classified in 12 anatomic segments for data analysis of the imaging modalities as well as histopathologic findings. The segment with the highest radiotracer uptake was defined as the "index lesion." All cases were scheduled to undergo prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Intraprostatic and pelvic nodal [

resultsOf the 312 analyzed regions, 120 regions (4 to 8 lesions per patient) showed abnormal findings in the prostate gland. In a region-based analysis, overall sensitivity and specificity of [

conclusions[ KEY POINTS: • [

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsBombesinCholineGallium RadioisotopesHumansMalePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyBombesinCholinefluorocholinefluoromethylcholineGallium Radioisotopes[18F]FCH[68Ga]Ga-RM2mpMRIPET-CTProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35864350
PMCPMC9755087
OpenAlexW4286490588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.