Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35864271›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2022

Preventing railway suicides through level crossing removal: a multiple-arm pre-post study design in Victoria, Australia.

Angela Clapperton, Jeremy Dwyer, Matthew J Spittal, Leo Roberts, Jane Pirkis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Uncovering Means Restriction Activities for Suicide Prevention That Have Been Undertaken in Australia: A Scoping Review.Asia-Pacific psychiatry : official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The effectiveness of installing trackside fencing in preventing railway suicides: a pre-post study design in Victoria, Australia.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angela ClappertonMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia. angela.clapperton@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6129-3404
Jeremy DwyerCoroners Prevention Unit, Coroners Court of Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Matthew J SpittalMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
Leo RobertsMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
Jane PirkisMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUFamily Court of Australia · AU

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council 1173126Australian National Health and Medical Research Council 1191874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRail level crossing removals to improve transport performance across metropolitan Melbourne (state of Victoria) resulted in new rail fencing and grade-separation of tracks from the surrounding environment at several sites. These design changes restricted pedestrian access to the rail tracks, which is a countermeasure known to prevent railway suicide in other settings. We examined whether any such suicide prevention effect followed the removals.

methodsWe used a multiple-arm pre-post design to test whether a decrease in monthly frequency of railway suicides occurred at level crossing removal sites (intervention sites), compared to randomly matched sites where level crossings had not yet been removed (control sites). We used data available in the Victorian Suicide Register covering the period 1st January 2008 to 30th June 2021.

resultsThe mean monthly number of railway suicides decreased by 68% within a 500 m radius of intervention sites (RR: 0.32; CI 95% 0.11-0.74) and by 61% within a 1000 m radius of intervention sites (RR: 0.39; CI 95% 0.21-0.68). There was no evidence that the mean monthly number of railway suicides changed at the control sites, either within a 500 m radius (RR: 0.88; CI 95% 0.47-1.56) or a 1000 m radius (RR: 0.82; CI 95% 0.52-1.26).

conclusionThe reduction in railway suicides at locations where level crossings were removed, demonstrates the suicide prevention benefits that can be derived from a major infrastructure project even if not initially intended. Planning for major infrastructure projects should include consideration of these benefits, with designs incorporating features to maximise suicide prevention impact.

Indexed as

RailroadsSuicide PreventionHumansVictoriaCase–control studyEpidemiologyIntervention studiesRailwaySuicide

Identifiers

PMID35864271
PMCPMC9636092
OpenAlexW4286500325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.